Source:
https://scmp.com/lifestyle/gadgets/article/3007662/why-samsung-had-delay-galaxy-fold-smartphone-release
Lifestyle/ Gadgets

Why Samsung had to delay the Galaxy Fold smartphone release

  • A number of review units lent to the media suffered several serious malfunctions
  • Screens started to malfunction within hours and after a day or two were totally useless
A Twitter image by Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman of the broken screen on his Samsung Fold review device. Photo: Twitter/Mark Gurman

Sales of the Samsung Galaxy Fold, a flashy US$1,980 device that unfolds from a smartphone into a small tablet, has been delayed in both the US and China after reports of screen malfunctions on review units that were loaned to several media organisations. The invitation-only preview of the device for the Hong Kong press, scheduled on April 23, was also postponed.

Problems with the Fold screen would be a deal breaker on their own. But the issues go deeper. As a phone, it’s not good enough. As a tablet, there are also too many drawbacks. As a combined device that can morph between the two, the Galaxy Fold is an intriguing sneak peek at what might be possible in the future of mobile computing – but probably not for years. 

The first Fold review model arrived on April 15. It was an exciting moment. In a world awash with black, shiny rectangles from Apple, Google and others, Samsung was at least trying something different. However, it quickly became apparent that compromises had been made.

When using the phone in folded format, the device was thick and somewhat cumbersome – about the width of two regular smartphones.

An attendee holds a Samsung Galaxy Fold at an unveiling event in New York on April 15. Photo: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg
An attendee holds a Samsung Galaxy Fold at an unveiling event in New York on April 15. Photo: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg

The 4.3-inch screen wasn’t useful for much beyond making and receiving calls; it’s too narrow for typing anything other than quick messages. The front display also looked odd compared with today’s full-screen phones, with very thick top and bottom bezels. Beyond that, the front glass seemed as durable as other smartphones. 

Unfolding the gadget revealed a large, bright and colourful display. But that’s when the serious flaws emerged. The inside screen had a plastic film that looked like a screen protector or any other thin piece of plastic that comes with a new phone, table or TV set when you take it out of the box. This protective layer began to peel in the left corner and the natural urge was to remove it. Once the film was off, the display started failing almost immediately. Samsung did not tell reviewers to keep this film on the device, nor did the packaging warn users against removing it. 

Samsung have postponed release of the Galaxy Fold after a number of problems with review devices. Photo: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg
Samsung have postponed release of the Galaxy Fold after a number of problems with review devices. Photo: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg

A day later, the left side of the folding display stopped functioning. Later that night, about three-quarters of the right side of the screen went black. By the next morning, the entire folding screen was dead. A small tear also developed at the top of the hinge. Poking at this may have contributed to the display problems. Still, a thin film should not be the difference between a US$1,980 phone working and completely malfunctioning. 

In response to questions about the phone’s build quality, Samsung later explained that “removing the protective layer or adding adhesives to the main display may cause damage” and that it will “ensure this information is clearly delivered to our customers”.

The company then provided a replacement. With the screen protector in place, the second Fold phone avoided the fate of its sibling. However, out of the box, the film had dimple-like puncture marks on the left side of the unfolded screen. There was also a noticeable gap between the edges of the screen protector and the actual side of the display, potentially leaving room for dust and lint to accumulate. After two days of normal use, slight marks developed at the edge of the screen protector.

Other small marks appeared across the screen as well, suggesting the Fold may not hold up well over time. There’s also a lot of glare and reflection, which makes viewing difficult in some lighting conditions.

The Galaxy Fold is marketed as a phone/tablet and will be sold for US$1,980. Photo: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg
The Galaxy Fold is marketed as a phone/tablet and will be sold for US$1,980. Photo: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg

The screen also had a noticeable crease across the centre where it folds. When watching video, the crease wasn’t that visible. But you can see it when doing other things such as reading a blog post or tapping through an app.

While not perfect, the software was the most polished part of the Galaxy Fold experience. Many apps seamlessly transitioned from the small screen to the unfolded screen (though you’ll rarely use that smaller screen).

Some of the operating system’s built-in functions also took advantage of the larger screen. Taking pictures with the very good camera by using a larger view finder was a great experience.  The ability to run three apps at once and move them around to your liking works well once you set it up and get used to the interface. 

After almost a week with the Galaxy Fold, Samsung’s effort feels like a concept device, not a finished product. The display had far too many flaws. The ability to have both a phone and a tablet in your pocket is a fascinating idea, but it’s still just an idea. 

The Galaxy Fold bursts with potential. Either Samsung or another company will eventually perfect it. If such a device can master being both a phone and a tablet, with optimised software and without those display flaws, it could be the next big mobile hit.