Source:
https://scmp.com/news/asia/south-asia/article/3041333/modis-new-citizenship-law-ruling-out-muslim-migrants-sparks
Asia/ South Asia

Narendra Modi’s new anti-Muslim citizenship law sparks fear, panic and protests in India

  • Under the law, non-Muslims who illegally migrated to India from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan will get citizenship, but not Muslims
  • If passed, the move threatens the secular foundation of the world’s second-most populous nation and its constitution that treats all religions equally
A woman holds a placard during a protest against the Citizenship Amendment Bill in Ahmadabad, India, on Monday. Photo: AP

India’s parliament is set to approve legislation preventing Muslim migrants from neighbouring countries from receiving citizenship – the next step in Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s hardline Hindu nationalist programme and one that is seen to go against the nation’s secular constitution.

The controversial citizenship bill has sparked protests and fear around India, with lawyers working overtime to help millions at risk of being left stateless in the world’s largest democracy.

The Citizenship Amendment Bill was introduced amid opposition protests and government cheers in the Lok Sabha or lower house of Parliament on Monday. It is listed for debate later in the day.

The proposed changes will allow citizenship for Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsees, and Christians who illegally migrated to India from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.

If passed as expected, the move threatens the secular foundation of the world’s second-most populous nation and its constitution that treats all religions equally.

As for Modi, it’s a third major move out of his right-wing playbook since retaining power earlier this year that adversely affects the country’s Muslim minority population.

On August 5, India scrapped nearly seven decades of autonomy in the Muslim-majority region of Kashmir.

Just three weeks later in the northeastern state of Assam, some 1.9 million people, mostly Muslims, faced the risk of losing their Indian citizenship as Modi’s government seeks to enforce a National Register of Citizens to weed out illegal migrants.

In November, Hindus won the Supreme Court case over a religious site disputed for centuries in the northern city of Ayodhya. Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had promised a grand temple there.

“This is a clear sign that the Hindu right in India have been emboldened to push forward with their agenda,” said Katharine Adeney, director of the University of Nottingham Asia Research Institute who specialises in South Asia politics and ethnic conflict.

“What it will do is to contribute to a growing sense of insecurity for the Muslim populations across India,” Adeney said, noting it was “hugely symbolic and undermines the neutrality of the Indian state to its religious groups”.

Students protest against the Citizenship Amendment Bill in Gauhati on Monday. Photo: AP
Students protest against the Citizenship Amendment Bill in Gauhati on Monday. Photo: AP

Anas Tanwir is travelling across the country, organising workshops to raise awareness to ensure people are prepared for the changes, particularly among Muslims and poor sections of society.

“The Citizenship Amendment Bill is the first step toward a change in the nature of the nation,” said Tanwir, a lawyer working against the proposed law who runs the Indian Civil Liberties Union.

“This is the government of India saying that India is the custodian of all the Hindus,” he said. “People are either unaware or they are very scared. No one wants to face a this kind of situation.”

Activists hang the effigies of Indian PM Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah during a protest against the Citizenship Amendment Bill in Gauhati on Monday. Photo: AP
Activists hang the effigies of Indian PM Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah during a protest against the Citizenship Amendment Bill in Gauhati on Monday. Photo: AP

The hashtag #CitizenshipAmendmentBill2019 was trending at the top spot on Twitter in India.

By late Monday afternoon, more than 28,000 people had tweeted about the bill, with many supporting the government and others calling it an attack on the country’s secular constitution.

A group of 900 scientists and scholars have issued a joint statement against the proposed bill saying use of religion as a legal criterion for determining Indian citizenship is disturbing.

Activists have organised protest meetings and sit-ins in various cities including Hyderabad, Lucknow, Mysore, Pune, Bangalore and New Delhi. If approved by the Parliament, the law is likely to be challenged in the courts.

The government says the changes are intended to protect religious minorities escaping persecution from neighbouring Muslim-majority countries.

Home Minister Amit Shah has defended it, saying Muslims do not face persecution in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh and therefore do not qualify.

“If someone comes here to earn a livelihood or to disrupt law and order, then they are intruders,” Shah said in recent a TV interview.

The changes in citizenship law and the National Registry of Citizens intended to expel illegal immigrants were key election promises by Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party.

Shah had clarified in election rallies that Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists do not have to fear the changes and will not have to leave India.

When the proposed nationwide National Register of Citizens is prepared, people excluded from the list will be required to prove their Indian citizenship before a tribunal or risk detention or deportation.

Protesters take part in a torchlight procession against the Citizenship Amendment Bill in Guwahati, Assam, on Monday. Photo: EPA-EFE
Protesters take part in a torchlight procession against the Citizenship Amendment Bill in Guwahati, Assam, on Monday. Photo: EPA-EFE

Last month, the government informed the Parliament that 988 so-called foreigners were being held in six detention centers in Assam.

This will be the second attempt by the Modi administration to amend citizenship law.

In January, the legislation was passed in the lower house of parliament but lapsed as the upper house did not take it up.