Myanmar MPs block Aung San Suu Kyi’s bid to become president, in line with military’s veto

Myanmar’s parliament rejected a proposed constitutional amendment on Wednesday that would have allowed the country’s de facto leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, to officially become president.

The rejection had been expected because the proposal was opposed by the military, which – under the constitution adopted when it held power – holds enough parliamentary seats to block any constitutional change.

The defeated motion was one of several constitutional changes proposed by Suu Kyi’s ruling National League for Democracy party, with most expected to be blocked.

Article 59(f) of the constitution bars a person from becoming president if his or her spouse or children are foreign citizens. Suu Kyi’s two sons are British nationals, as was her late husband.

Despite the rule, Suu Kyi holds executive power in the government because of a legal loophole that allowed the creation of the post of state counsellor, to which she was appointed. Under the arrangement the actual president – a member of her party – defers to her.

The efforts to change the constitution come ahead of a general election slated for late this year.

Suu Kyi’s party took power in 2016 by winning a landslide election victory after five decades of direct and indirect military rule over Myanmar.

But its intended reforms have been thwarted by the rules the military inserted in the 2008 constitution.

In addition to wielding a veto over constitutional change, the military controls three key ministries: defence, border and home affairs.

Any constitutional change requires the approval of more than 75 per cent of the members of the combined houses of parliament. Members of the military automatically hold 25 per cent of the seats, and can usually also count on the support of a civilian opposition party allied with it, the Union Solidarity and Development Party.

Aung San Suu Kyi at The Hague to answer for Rohingya genocide

Suu Kyi was an ardent critic of military rule during her decades-long, Nobel Peace Prize-winning nonviolent struggle for democracy.

But the realities of sharing power with the military have made the relationship more ambiguous.

She has defended the army’s actions in the western state of Rakhine, which drove more than 700,000 members of the Muslim Rohingya minority to seek shelter in neighbouring Bangladesh.

The well-documented brutality of what the military called a counter-insurgency operation caused the International Court of Justice to accept a case charging Myanmar with genocide.