Source:
https://scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3095043/university-hong-kong-governing-council-sacks-legal-scholar
Hong Kong/ Politics

University of Hong Kong governing council sacks legal scholar Benny Tai over convictions for Occupy protests

  • Tai, an associate professor, learns fate after HKU council holds meeting on matter
  • He was sentenced to 16 months in prison last April for two public nuisance offences related to 2014 civil disobedience movement
Benny Tai, 56, has been out on bail since last August, pending an appeal. Photo: Edmond So

The University of Hong Kong’s governing council sacked legal scholar Benny Tai Yiu-ting on Tuesday over his criminal convictions for the Occupy protest movement he co-founded in 2014.

Tai, an associate professor of law and outspoken opposition activist, learned his fate on Tuesday night after the HKU council reversed a recommendation by the university’s senate earlier this month that there were not enough grounds to dismiss him although his actions amounted to misconduct.

Responding to his dismissal, Tai said the city’s academic institutions “cannot protect their members from internal and outside interferences”, adding that the university council’s decision “marked the end of academic freedom in Hong Kong”.

Five years after Occupy: comparing Hong Kong’s 2014 movement with the 2019 extradition bill protests

08:41

Five years after Occupy: comparing Hong Kong’s 2014 movement with the 2019 extradition bill protests

Hours after the decision, Beijing’s liaison office in the city said in a statement it supported the dismissal as an act that punished “evil” and upheld justice.

“Tai has used the sacred position of an educational institution to spread fallacies and confuse right and wrong, as well as promote illegal [activities] which had misled and poisoned a group of young people,” a spokesman said.

The office added Tai had “organised, planned, carried out, incited and instigated events” including Occupy Central and the opposition camp’s primary elections earlier this month, and that his actions “increased conflict in society and poisoned Hong Kong’s political atmosphere”.

Three sources told the Post that 18 council members supported the decision to dismiss Tai while two were against it. University president Zhang Xiang did not cast a vote, while two other members were either absent or had withdrawn from the talks because of conflict of interests.

The university’s council – headed by Arthur Li Kwok-cheung, a member of the city leader’s cabinet – comprises 23 members. A majority in the group are from outside the university, including pro-establishment lawmaker Abraham Shek and Sino Land deputy chairman Daryl Ng Win-kong.

Tai, 56, was sentenced to 16 months in prison in April last year for two public nuisance offences related to the 2014 civil disobedience movement for greater democracy, which brought parts of the city to a standstill for 79 days. He has been out on bail since last August, pending an appeal.

The University of Hong Kong initiated an inquiry committee against Benny Tai in June last year. Photo: Xiaomei Chen
The University of Hong Kong initiated an inquiry committee against Benny Tai in June last year. Photo: Xiaomei Chen

An inquiry committee was initiated last year at the discretion of Zhang, and it submitted a report by May to the senate. The senate, comprising mainly academics, agreed in early July with the finding that Tai was guilty of “misconduct” but that his actions did not amount to grounds for dismissal.

If Tai wishes to lodge an appeal over his dismissal, he would have to do so through HKU’s chancellor – a role held by Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor at all of the city’s eight publicly funded universities – or by judicial review.

Tai was not present at Tuesday’s meeting but a written submission from him was handed to the council, according to a source present at the session. The academic had argued that the Occupy protests were peaceful, adding that as the university’s senate had already made a recommendation, he did not see any reasons the council would decide against that suggestion.

The source added that council members voted in two rounds. The first round involved a majority of participants supporting the handling of Tai’s case now instead of waiting until his appeal process was completed, while in the second round, 18 members voted to dismiss Tai from his tenured position.

The source added that council chairman Li had promised that if Tai’s appeal, which would be heard next year, succeeded, the council would revisit his dismissal.

A day before, Baptist University lecturer and lawmaker Shiu Ka-chun, who was also convicted for taking part in the Occupy protests and who stood trial along with Tai, was told his contract would not be renewed after expiry by the end of August.

Tai, in a response on his social media page, said his dismissal reflected that academic staff in Hong Kong were no longer protected by their institutions.

“The decision to terminate my appointment was made not by the University of Hong Kong but by an authority beyond the university through its agents,” he wrote.

“It marks the end of academic freedom in Hong Kong ... Academic institutions in Hong Kong cannot protect their members from internal and outside interferences.”

He added he would continue his research and teachings “on the rule of law in another capacity”.

HKU alumni concern group deputy convenor Mak Tung-wing slammed the council’s decision as “violating procedural justice”, as Tai’s case was still pending an appeal.

HKU’s student union also said it would organise a petition to collect signatures to oppose the council’s decision and press for a review.

Hong Kong University values a ‘diversity of views and vigorous debate’, its president Zhang Xiang told staff in an email. Photo: May Tse
Hong Kong University values a ‘diversity of views and vigorous debate’, its president Zhang Xiang told staff in an email. Photo: May Tse

In an email to staff, Zhang said it would be inappropriate to disclose or discuss the council’s decision citing privacy concerns, but stressed that the university “values diversity of views and vigorous debate, embracing discourse and robust engagement”.

“All of these qualities represent the quintessence of a university and the spirit of our scholarly community. Let us stand tall and chart the way forward in solidarity. I need above everything else your help to tackle the challenges ahead,” he said.

In a written statement without naming Tai, an HKU spokeswoman said a personnel issue concerning a teaching staff member had been resolved, and he had been given “full opportunity to present the facts, submit written statements and relevant documents, and present the case in writing and in person” during the inquiry process.

The spokeswoman stressed that the decision came following “stringent and impartial due process” as well as “careful deliberations and considerations”.

“We hope members of the public understand that this is an internal personnel matter of the university and that the autonomy of the institution should be respected,” she added.