Source:
https://scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/3010583/we-discriminate-against-genius-donald-trump-seeks
World/ United States & Canada

‘We discriminate against genius’: Donald Trump seeks to overhaul US green card system to favour skills over family-based immigration

  • Under new proposal, more spots would go to exceptional students, professionals and people with high-level and vocational degrees
  • US president’s plan has drawn heavy Democrat opposition and faces dubious prospects in a divided Congress
US President Donald Trump speaks about modernising the immigration system at the White House on Thursday. Photo: AP

Setting aside some of his hard-line rhetoric on illegal immigration, US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that he wanted to recruit “top talent” to the nation as he unveiled his latest efforts to reform residency laws after years of setbacks and stalemates.

“We discriminate against genius,” Trump said of current policies, which he contended excessively favour family-based immigration. “We discriminate against brilliance. We won’t any more once we get this passed.”

The latest effort, spearheaded by Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, focuses on beefing up border security and rethinking the nation’s green card system so that it would favour people with high-level skills, degrees and job offers instead of relatives of those already in the country.

The proposed shift to a more merit-based system prioritising high-skilled workers would mark a dramatic departure from the nation’s largely family-based approach, which officials said gives roughly 66 per cent of green cards to those with family ties and 12 per cent based on skills.

The president’s plan, unveiled in a Rose Garden ceremony, has yet to be embraced by his own party – let alone Democrats – and faces dubious prospects in a divided Congress. The show of magnanimity comes as Trump seeks to put a softer facade on the signature campaign issue from his first campaign as he eyes his 2020 re-election.

“Our plan is pro-American, pro-immigrant and pro-worker,” Trump said, adding that it contrasts with what he called Democrats’ support of “chaos”, and predicted it will lead him to victory next November.

“Our proposal fulfils our sacred duty to those living here today while ensuring America remains a welcoming country to immigrants joining us tomorrow,” he added.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi meets reporters at her weekly news conference at the Capitol on Thursday. Photo: AP
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi meets reporters at her weekly news conference at the Capitol on Thursday. Photo: AP

Efforts to overhaul the immigration system have gone nowhere for three decades amid deep partisan divisions. Prospects for an agreement seem especially bleak as the 2020 elections near, though the plan could give Trump and the Republicans a proposal to rally behind, even as Democrats signalled their opposition.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Trump’s emphasis on merit-based immigration is “condescending” because families have merit, too.

The plan does not address what to do about the millions of immigrants already living in the country illegally, including hundreds of thousands of young “Dreamers” brought to the US as children – a top priority for Democrats. Nor does it reduce overall rates of immigration, as many conservative Republicans would like to see.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said “Dreamer” immigrants were not included in Trump’s new plan because past proposals involving them have failed.

In briefings Wednesday that attracted dozens of journalists and outside allies, administration officials said the plan would create a points-based visa system, similar to those used by Canada and other countries.

Under the new plan, the US would award the same number of green cards as it now does. But far more would go to exceptional students, professionals and people with high-level and vocational degrees. Factors such as age, English language ability and employment offers would also be considered.

Border Patrol Public Affairs Officer Vincent Pirro looks at border wall prototypes in San Diego in April. Photo: Carolyn Van Houten via The Washington Post
Border Patrol Public Affairs Officer Vincent Pirro looks at border wall prototypes in San Diego in April. Photo: Carolyn Van Houten via The Washington Post

The diversity visa lottery, which offers green cards to citizens of countries with historically low rates of immigration to the US, would be eliminated.

As part of the plan, officials want to shore up ports of entry to ensure all vehicles and people are screened and to create a self-sustaining fund, paid for with increased fees, to modernise ports of entry.

The plan also calls for building border wall in targeted locations and continues a push for an overhaul to the US asylum system, with the goal of processing fewer applications and removing people who do not qualify faster.

While the officials insisted their effort was not a “political” plan, they nonetheless framed it as one they hoped Republicans would unite behind, making clear to voters what the party is “for”.

“I don’t think it’s designed to get Democratic support as much as it is to unify the Republican Party around border security, a negotiating position,” said Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a close ally of the White House.

Jared Kushner speaks with guests after US President Donald Trump’s remarks on immigration reform at the White House on Thursday. Photo: Reuters
Jared Kushner speaks with guests after US President Donald Trump’s remarks on immigration reform at the White House on Thursday. Photo: Reuters

Indeed, the plan drew immediate criticism from Democrats as well as immigration activists, who remain deeply sceptical of Trump after past negotiation failures.

I don’t think it’s designed to get Democratic support as much as it is to unify the Republican Party around border security Lindsey Graham, Republican senator

Democrats and some Republicans tried crafting a compromise with Trump last year that would have helped young Dreamer immigrants and added money for border security.

But those talks collapsed over White House demands to curb legal immigration and a dramatic Senate showdown in which lawmakers rejected three rival proposals that aligned with the “four pillars” immigration plan Trump unveiled that year.

Lisa Koop, director of legal services at the National Immigrant Justice Centre, also criticised the various planks of the proposal, including its failure to address those brought to the US illegally as children who are currently protected from deportation by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy, or DACA, which Trump has tried to end.

“A plan that forces families apart, limits access to asylum and other humanitarian relief, and doesn’t contemplate a path to citizenship for DACA recipients and other undocumented community members is clearly a political stunt intended to posture rather than problem-solve,” she said.

Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Centre for Immigration Studies, which advocates for lower immigration rates, applauded a “very positive effort” on legal immigration, but said it was “undermined by the embrace of the current very high level of immigration”.

Republicans on Capitol Hill, too, voiced scepticism. A PowerPoint presentation shared with reporters on Wednesday referred to the plan as “The Republican Proposal”, even though many party members had yet to see it.