<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="link" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:fb="http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:media="http://www.rssboard.org/media-rss" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/" xmlns:sioc="http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#" xmlns:sioct="http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
  <channel>
    <title>Hugh White - South China Morning Post</title>
    <link>https://www.scmp.com/rss/323905/feed</link>
    <description>Hugh White is emeritus professor of strategic studies at the Australian National University. He served for many years as a senior defence and intelligence official with the Australian government before heading ANU's Strategic and Defence Studies Centre. His publications include “The China Choice” (2012) and “How to Defend Australia” (forthcoming 2019).</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <atom:link href="https://www.scmp.com/rss/323905/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <description>Eighteen months ago, Australians were stunned when they learned of the Aukus proposal for their country to build nuclear-powered submarines. An initiative of such scale and audacity seemed almost to defy critique and analysis.
But that began to change last month when the leaders of the United States, Britain and Australia gathered in San Diego to announce the broad outline of how this massive project would work. They revealed a plan of immense complexity and staggering cost, beset by a host of...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/article/3217859/aukus-gamble-can-australia-rely-us-alliance-secure-its-future-asia-amid-rising-china?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/article/3217859/aukus-gamble-can-australia-rely-us-alliance-secure-its-future-asia-amid-rising-china?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 00:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>The Aukus gamble: can Australia rely on US alliance to secure its future in Asia amid rising China?</title>
      <enclosure length="3500" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/canvas/2023/04/21/bad3eb58-29c7-4dd8-b4de-e19e8c4bf11b_36f6733a.jpg?itok=oGPoIvKs&amp;v=1682063289"/>
      <media:content height="2333" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/canvas/2023/04/21/bad3eb58-29c7-4dd8-b4de-e19e8c4bf11b_36f6733a.jpg?itok=oGPoIvKs&amp;v=1682063289" width="3500"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>In Asia, an old threat to peace is returning. For many decades, it has seemed almost unthinkable that the region’s major powers could again engage in a full-scale war, as they did 75 years ago.
Today, the United States and China confront each other as bitter rivals. Each seeks strategic dominance in East Asia in the “Asian century”: the US wants to retain the primacy it has exercised for over 100 years, and China wants to take its place.
The stakes are high. Neither side seeks war – in fact,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/article/3103028/help-defuse-us-china-tensions-asian-states-must-agree-americas?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/article/3103028/help-defuse-us-china-tensions-asian-states-must-agree-americas?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 22:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>To help defuse US-China tensions, Asian states must agree on America’s role in region</title>
      <enclosure length="3200" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/methode/2020/09/26/da42ca8e-fca5-11ea-9bb5-57ca6b07e40a_image_hires_083437.jpg?itok=XkJGAgk6&amp;v=1601080492"/>
      <media:content height="2128" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/methode/2020/09/26/da42ca8e-fca5-11ea-9bb5-57ca6b07e40a_image_hires_083437.jpg?itok=XkJGAgk6&amp;v=1601080492" width="3200"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>Declaring a new cold war against China is easy, but working out how to fight it and win it is much harder. While almost everyone in Washington these days seems to agree that resisting China’s seemingly insatiable ambition is now America’s highest strategic priority, the nature and scale of the task is still enveloped in uncertainty.
No one seems too worried about this, however, because they assume that a new cold war with China is going to be easy to win.
The few attempts we have seen to...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/china/hugh-white-america-must-be-prepared-commit-nuclear-war-win-its-cold-war-china/article/3001074?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/china/hugh-white-america-must-be-prepared-commit-nuclear-war-win-its-cold-war-china/article/3001074?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 09:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Is America willing to fight a nuclear war to win a cold one?</title>
      <enclosure length="1024" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/2019/03/06/0_cx236_2ae8_9.jpg?itok=CgAgtIrL&amp;v=1551855311"/>
      <media:content height="608" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/2019/03/06/0_cx236_2ae8_9.jpg?itok=CgAgtIrL&amp;v=1551855311" width="1024"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>Declaring a new cold war against China is easy, but working out how to fight it and win it is much harder. While almost everyone in Washington these days seems to agree that resisting China’s seemingly insatiable ambition is now America’s highest strategic priority, the nature and scale of the task is still enveloped in uncertainty.
No one seems too worried about this, however, because they assume that a new cold war with China is going to be easy to win.
The few attempts we have seen to...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/united-states/article/2188648/can-us-win-new-cold-war-china-not-without?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/united-states/article/2188648/can-us-win-new-cold-war-china-not-without?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 18:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Can the US win the new cold war with China? Not without risking a nuclear war</title>
      <enclosure length="2728" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2019/03/06/24152426-3f25-11e9-b20a-0cdc8de4a6f4_image_hires_142428.jpg?itok=AjpWvptf&amp;v=1551853472"/>
      <media:content height="1618" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2019/03/06/24152426-3f25-11e9-b20a-0cdc8de4a6f4_image_hires_142428.jpg?itok=AjpWvptf&amp;v=1551853472" width="2728"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>Australia has long walked a tightrope between the United States and China, and now is in danger of falling off. Canberra’s balancing act went wobbly for all to see this week after a meeting between the two countries’ foreign ministers. When Australia’s Julie Bishop described it as “very warm”, China’s Foreign Ministry bluntly contradicted her. Australia needs to take off its “coloured glasses” if the relationship is to “return to the right track”, its spokesman warned.
China’s impatience is...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2147502/australia-must-ask-does-america-have-power-or-resolve-stop?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2147502/australia-must-ask-does-america-have-power-or-resolve-stop?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 09:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Australia must ask: does America have the power or resolve to stop China’s rise?</title>
      <enclosure length="2728" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2018/05/24/44f5df20-5f31-11e8-a4de-9f5e0e4dd719_image_hires_174519.jpg?itok=h8-smqEs&amp;v=1527155124"/>
      <media:content height="1618" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2018/05/24/44f5df20-5f31-11e8-a4de-9f5e0e4dd719_image_hires_174519.jpg?itok=h8-smqEs&amp;v=1527155124" width="2728"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>You could call it the “Woody Allen Doctrine”. For years, Washington’s formidable band of Asia experts have persuaded US presidents to spend precious days, and endure gruelling transpacific flights, to attend Asia’s ­annual round of summits with their silly shirts and anodyne communiqués, by quoting the comedian’s most famous line: Eighty per cent of success in life is just showing up.
It is an appealing idea. Simply by attending these meetings, the ­experts have argued, the president can...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2120010/why-us-no-match-china-asia-and-trump-should-have-stayed-home?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2120010/why-us-no-match-china-asia-and-trump-should-have-stayed-home?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Why the US is no match for China in Asia, and Trump should have stayed at home and played golf</title>
      <enclosure length="2870" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/11/15/1da59a6e-c9e5-11e7-9743-ef57fdb29dbc_image_hires_172819.jpg?itok=VPZlGVyj&amp;v=1510738103"/>
      <media:content height="1335" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/11/15/1da59a6e-c9e5-11e7-9743-ef57fdb29dbc_image_hires_172819.jpg?itok=VPZlGVyj&amp;v=1510738103" width="2870"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>When North Korea tested a ballistic missile back in February, the Trump administration threatened military action. They did the same thing when Pyongyang tested again on July 4. But each time, after a few days of ­rising anxiety, the tough talk evaporated. Washington went back to the same old measures – sanctions and UN Security Council resolutions – which have so plainly failed to stop North Korea’s nuclear and missiles programmes for so long.
That leaves North Korea’s weapons programme intact...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2103055/empty-us-threats-over-north-korea-are-serving-beijings?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2103055/empty-us-threats-over-north-korea-are-serving-beijings?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Empty US threats over North Korea are serving Beijing’s interests</title>
      <enclosure length="1728" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/07/18/57614938-6b99-11e7-9575-882aa2208a4d_image_hires_181205.jpg?itok=UVGetOUf&amp;v=1500372729"/>
      <media:content height="1778" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/07/18/57614938-6b99-11e7-9575-882aa2208a4d_image_hires_181205.jpg?itok=UVGetOUf&amp;v=1500372729" width="1728"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>Donald Trump’s first 100 days were always going to be interesting. Never before have Americans elected a person to the Oval Office who knew so little about foreign policy, and who appeared to care so little about it. But it seemed simply unimaginable that he could conduct himself as president in the reckless, ill-informed way that he presented himself as a candidate.
Nevertheless, it seemed equally hard to imagine that he could undergo the kind of changes that would be needed if he was to fulfil...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2091408/syria-and-north-korea-crises-show-donald-trump-his-bumbling?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2091408/syria-and-north-korea-crises-show-donald-trump-his-bumbling?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Syria and North Korea crises show Donald Trump at his bumbling worst</title>
      <enclosure length="2906" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/04/28/ddd3d272-2bdb-11e7-acff-d77f13c4971d_image_hires_144451.jpg?itok=wT8O9mFP&amp;v=1493361898"/>
      <media:content height="1654" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/04/28/ddd3d272-2bdb-11e7-acff-d77f13c4971d_image_hires_144451.jpg?itok=wT8O9mFP&amp;v=1493361898" width="2906"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>To America’s anxious allies, President Donald Trump’s plans for a big boost to the US defence budget might appear to be welcome news. It seems to offer reassurance that despite the strong strand of “America first” isolationism in his campaign, the new president is committed to upholding America’s strategic commitments, and preserving its role as the guarantor of peace and stability in key regions like Europe and East Asia.
But it would be a mistake to see the president’s defence budget...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2079563/why-trumps-budget-boost-wont-actually-strengthen-us-defences?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2079563/why-trumps-budget-boost-wont-actually-strengthen-us-defences?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2017 01:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Why Trump’s budget boost won’t actually strengthen US defences</title>
      <enclosure length="1701" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/03/17/700bb1ba-0af2-11e7-8938-48dffbf7165d_image_hires.jpg?itok=NJYS4O_3&amp;v=1489745029"/>
      <media:content height="1783" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/03/17/700bb1ba-0af2-11e7-8938-48dffbf7165d_image_hires.jpg?itok=NJYS4O_3&amp;v=1489745029" width="1701"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>We should not take Rex Tillerson too seriously when he threatened last week that America would deny China access to its bases in the South China Sea, plainly implying a willingness to use force to do so if necessary. He was not speaking from a prepared text, and his remarks were so ill-informed and foolish that he probably just didn’t know what he was talking about. So this was a gaffe, not a statement of policy.
On Trump’s foreign policy, let common sense prevail
But that doesn’t mean his...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2062762/their-threats-china-trump-and-tillerson-are-making-rookie?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2062762/their-threats-china-trump-and-tillerson-are-making-rookie?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>With their threats to China, Trump and Tillerson are making rookie blunders that will only hurt US credibility</title>
      <enclosure length="1701" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/01/17/2b7e8e42-dc98-11e6-8fcb-68eb4ed74971_image_hires.jpg?itok=YVwC1DEL&amp;v=1484646324"/>
      <media:content height="1736" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/01/17/2b7e8e42-dc98-11e6-8fcb-68eb4ed74971_image_hires.jpg?itok=YVwC1DEL&amp;v=1484646324" width="1701"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>