<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="link" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:fb="http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:media="http://www.rssboard.org/media-rss" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/" xmlns:sioc="http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#" xmlns:sioct="http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
  <channel>
    <title>Will Saetren - South China Morning Post</title>
    <link>https://www.scmp.com/rss/325066/feed</link>
    <description>Will Saetren (@WillSaetren) is a project lead at CRDF Global, where he specialises in nuclear security. He previously worked at the Institute for China-America Studies where he directed the organisation's portfolio on nuclear weapons policy. He is the author of Ghosts of the Cold War: Rethinking the Need for a New Nuclear Cruise Missile, and an alumnus of the Roger Hale fellowship at the Ploughshares Fund.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <atom:link href="https://www.scmp.com/rss/325066/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <description>August 20, 2020. That was the day the US Secretary of state Michael R. Pompeo swaggered up to a podium at the United Nations, proclaimed that up was down, unicorns were real, and that he could really go for some curry fish balls right about now.
I am, of course, exaggerating. But not by much. What Pompeo did was argue that the United States is legally entitled to enforce the technical provisions of an international agreement that it abandoned more than two years ago.
If that sounds confusing to...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3098640/global-outcry-against-us-call-sanctions-snapback-iran-was-long-time?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3098640/global-outcry-against-us-call-sanctions-snapback-iran-was-long-time?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Global outcry against US call for sanctions ‘snapback’ on Iran was a long time coming</title>
      <enclosure length="5760" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/methode/2020/08/26/549071f4-e5ec-11ea-8600-abe4f45458c9_image_hires_012436.jpg?itok=ZDkQ_2l7&amp;v=1598376284"/>
      <media:content height="3840" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/methode/2020/08/26/549071f4-e5ec-11ea-8600-abe4f45458c9_image_hires_012436.jpg?itok=ZDkQ_2l7&amp;v=1598376284" width="5760"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>When things go wrong, the United States likes to be able to point the finger of blame at others. Devastation and civil war in Syria? Russia’s fault. North Korea not giving up its nuclear weapons? China must do more to enforce sanctions.
This time, it is different. The Trump administration is quietly letting the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (Start) die. If it does, the US will have no one to blame but itself for making the world a more dangerous place.
Beyond an arms control treaty between...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3051641/why-trump-should-extend-nuclear-arms-treaty-russia-now-and-worry?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3051641/why-trump-should-extend-nuclear-arms-treaty-russia-now-and-worry?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Why Donald Trump should extend nuclear arms treaty with Russia now and worry about China later</title>
      <enclosure length="1200" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/methode/2020/02/22/028d39aa-53d9-11ea-8948-c9a8d8f9b667_image_hires_015725.JPG?itok=HCL4eDmp&amp;v=1582307850"/>
      <media:content height="800" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/methode/2020/02/22/028d39aa-53d9-11ea-8948-c9a8d8f9b667_image_hires_015725.JPG?itok=HCL4eDmp&amp;v=1582307850" width="1200"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>Last month, when much of the world was distracted by the US-North Korea summit in Hanoi, one of the most dangerous crises in the post-cold-war era quietly unfolded. 
When Indian warplanes conducted air strikes against a terrorist training camp in Pakistan on February 26, it marked the first time in history that a nuclear-weapons state has conducted air strikes against another.
The stand-off quickly spiralled out of control. Pakistan responded to India’s air-assault with heavy artillery strikes...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/united-states/article/3001305/nuclear-weapons-are-dangerous-never-tactical?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/united-states/article/3001305/nuclear-weapons-are-dangerous-never-tactical?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>India and Pakistan take note: the ‘Madman Theory’ of using tactical nuclear weapons lives up to its name</title>
      <enclosure length="2728" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/methode/2019/03/12/fcd0160e-44ac-11e9-b5dc-9921d5eb8a6d_image_hires_180738.jpg?itok=LWq7SvFr&amp;v=1552385266"/>
      <media:content height="1618" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/methode/2019/03/12/fcd0160e-44ac-11e9-b5dc-9921d5eb8a6d_image_hires_180738.jpg?itok=LWq7SvFr&amp;v=1552385266" width="2728"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>For months, the United States and China have been exchanging blows over trade. What began with the Trump administration imposing tariffs on a handful of goods earlier this year has ballooned into a list that includes thousands of items. In July, Trump announced that he is prepared to impose tariffs on all US$500 billion of imports from China. 
The showdown between the world’s two economic powerhouses has shaken the global financial system to its core. Over the summer, the World Bank warned that...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/united-states/article/2164221/us-cold-war-containment-strategy-against-china?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/united-states/article/2164221/us-cold-war-containment-strategy-against-china?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2018 18:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>US cold war containment strategy against China may not end the Soviet way. Instead, it could explode into armed conflict</title>
      <enclosure length="2728" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2018/09/17/67fc1a0c-b7f6-11e8-b64d-19e275708746_image_hires_063953.jpg?itok=FXxTjzN2&amp;v=1537137607"/>
      <media:content height="1618" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2018/09/17/67fc1a0c-b7f6-11e8-b64d-19e275708746_image_hires_063953.jpg?itok=FXxTjzN2&amp;v=1537137607" width="2728"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>Arms control isn’t dead, but it is dying and the process has been slow and painful. The death spiral began long before Donald Trump became president of the United States. The last major arms control treaty, New START, which limited Russia and the US to 1,550 deployed nuclear weapons each, was signed in 2010.
Since then, the arms control agenda has ground to a halt. In 2013, then president Barack Obama sought additional reductions, one-third beyond the limits of New START. But the Russians...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/united-states/article/2160177/trump-killing-nuclear-arms-control-or-can-he?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/united-states/article/2160177/trump-killing-nuclear-arms-control-or-can-he?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2018 07:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Is Trump killing nuclear arms control or can he broker deals with North Korea and Russia to make the world a safer place?</title>
      <enclosure length="2731" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2018/08/17/4619dcc0-a1fe-11e8-90bf-ccc49f9b020a_image_hires_172555.jpg?itok=QsrSzDmY&amp;v=1534497946"/>
      <media:content height="1618" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2018/08/17/4619dcc0-a1fe-11e8-90bf-ccc49f9b020a_image_hires_172555.jpg?itok=QsrSzDmY&amp;v=1534497946" width="2731"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>Last month, the Trump administration unveiled its nuclear policy review. As expected, the document significantly departed from Donald Trump’s predecessors. Every American president since Richard Nixon has cut the role and number of nuclear weapons in US strategy, but Trump called for new low-yield nuclear weapons and expanded the circumstances in which they can be used.
This is a dangerous development. In regions where superpower tensions already run high, the United States has significantly...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2139163/will-us-new-nuclear-policies-spark-arms-race-china?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2139163/will-us-new-nuclear-policies-spark-arms-race-china?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 05:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Will the US’ new nuclear policies spark an arms race with China?</title>
      <enclosure length="3000" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2018/03/28/ac102c6e-31b0-11e8-9019-a420e6317de0_image_hires_125621.JPG?itok=7GIf-kib&amp;v=1522212984"/>
      <media:content height="2266" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2018/03/28/ac102c6e-31b0-11e8-9019-a420e6317de0_image_hires_125621.JPG?itok=7GIf-kib&amp;v=1522212984" width="3000"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>Last weekend, Donald Trump celebrated the one-year anniversary of his presidency. The 45th president of the United States entered office vowing to get tough with China, cut better deals and reassert America’s position as a Pacific power.
But one year later, Trump’s incoherent foreign policy has brought the US closer to “bending the knee” on the global stage than since the second world war. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the Asia-Pacific, where Trump has left the strategic stability of the...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2130298/how-trumps-incoherent-foreign-policy-promotes-uncertainty?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2130298/how-trumps-incoherent-foreign-policy-promotes-uncertainty?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>How Trump’s incoherent foreign policy promotes uncertainty in the Asia-Pacific and risks disaster</title>
      <enclosure length="1701" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2018/01/25/4127836c-01ad-11e8-b181-443655c1d2b1_image_hires_173037.jpg?itok=QtDglw1k&amp;v=1516872641"/>
      <media:content height="1417" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2018/01/25/4127836c-01ad-11e8-b181-443655c1d2b1_image_hires_173037.jpg?itok=QtDglw1k&amp;v=1516872641" width="1701"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>Few people realise that Donald Trump, as the American president, has total control over the US nuclear arsenal. Every last one of America’s nuclear weapons is at the US president’s disposal 24/7 and can be launched at any time, for any reason. It’s one of the few processes in the American political system where there are no checks and balances. That is not just an American problem, it’s a global problem.
The United States possesses thousands of nuclear weapons, more than enough to end human...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2121376/irrational-trump-office-nuclear-power-us-president-must-be?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2121376/irrational-trump-office-nuclear-power-us-president-must-be?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2017 01:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>With an irrational Trump in office, the nuclear power of US president must be tamed</title>
      <enclosure length="1701" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/11/26/c25568b0-d0fb-11e7-986f-48a2e310a482_image_hires_094129.jpg?itok=AyfacrMJ&amp;v=1511660494"/>
      <media:content height="1736" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/11/26/c25568b0-d0fb-11e7-986f-48a2e310a482_image_hires_094129.jpg?itok=AyfacrMJ&amp;v=1511660494" width="1701"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>The North Korean nuclear crisis is escalating out of control. North Korean foreign minister Ri Yong-ho recently declared that US President Donald Trump’s comments about destroying his country were a “declaration of war”, and that, in response, North Korea would shoot down US bombers, even if they were not in its airspace. Last week, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un issued an even more dire threat: to conduct an atmospheric test of a hydrogen bomb in the Pacific Ocean, a nightmare scenario for the...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2112889/real-reason-us-hasnt-tried-shoot-down-north-korean-missile?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2112889/real-reason-us-hasnt-tried-shoot-down-north-korean-missile?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>The real reason the US hasn’t tried to shoot down a North Korean missile</title>
      <enclosure length="1701" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/09/27/93f8e906-a36a-11e7-84b5-dfc1701cb40c_image_hires_181725.jpg?itok=cjyUsLhd&amp;v=1506507451"/>
      <media:content height="1571" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/09/27/93f8e906-a36a-11e7-84b5-dfc1701cb40c_image_hires_181725.jpg?itok=cjyUsLhd&amp;v=1506507451" width="1701"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>Using nuclear weapons against North Korea is a terrible idea. More than 70 years after the first and only use of nuclear weapons in combat, it seems odd to have to put this in writing, but the past several weeks of heightened tensions with North Korea have made it a necessity.
As the crisis on the Korean peninsula deepens, voices calling for military action to halt North Korea’s nuclear programme have grown stronger and bolder. Last week, Kevin James, a research fellow from the London School of...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2108876/why-us-military-strike-against-north-korea-would-be?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2108876/why-us-military-strike-against-north-korea-would-be?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Why a US military strike against North Korea would be disastrous</title>
      <enclosure length="2870" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/08/31/33504268-8d60-11e7-9f40-4d9615941c08_image_hires_092624.jpg?itok=ruzWApUI&amp;v=1504142790"/>
      <media:content height="1370" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/images/methode/2017/08/31/33504268-8d60-11e7-9f40-4d9615941c08_image_hires_092624.jpg?itok=ruzWApUI&amp;v=1504142790" width="2870"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>