<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="link" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:fb="http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:media="http://www.rssboard.org/media-rss" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/" xmlns:sioc="http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#" xmlns:sioct="http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
  <channel>
    <title>Manuel Galileo - South China Morning Post</title>
    <link>https://www.scmp.com/rss/519934/feed</link>
    <description>Manuel Galileo is a military analyst, Track II arms control diplomat and civil engineer. His research interests include coercive diplomacy, arms competitions, shifts in regional and global distributions of capabilities, and innovations in military technologies. He has an MSc in international relations from the London School of Economics (LSE) and an MA in diplomacy from SOAS.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <atom:link href="https://www.scmp.com/rss/519934/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <author>Dan Plesch,Manuel Galileo</author>
      <dc:creator>Dan Plesch,Manuel Galileo</dc:creator>
      <description>In nuclear war, the long-held assumption of mutual assured destruction no longer exists. Welcome to the age of permanent strategic instability, where superpowers mix fast and accurate nuclear and non-nuclear missiles in the same arsenal. The risk of war is greater than many realise.
The scale of catastrophe is also significant. A potential nuclear winter is estimated to amount to billions of deaths from starvation after years of global crop failures. Such risks and consequences are disastrously...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/opinion/world-opinion/article/3334240/why-advances-conventional-weapons-tech-should-worry-china-russia-and-us?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/opinion/world-opinion/article/3334240/why-advances-conventional-weapons-tech-should-worry-china-russia-and-us?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 12:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>Why advances in conventional weapons tech should worry China, Russia and US</title>
      <enclosure length="2728" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/canvas/2025/11/27/afaf5bad-bb90-4995-96c9-a691316e039f_7f7a19ab.jpg?itok=NO2oKqAY&amp;v=1764240988"/>
      <media:content height="1618" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/canvas/2025/11/27/afaf5bad-bb90-4995-96c9-a691316e039f_7f7a19ab.jpg?itok=NO2oKqAY&amp;v=1764240988" width="2728"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>In theory, China’s launchers of strategic nuclear missiles – jet or rocket-propelled weapons meant to strike targets far away and which are nuclear-armed – can be preventively taken out by the United States and its allies using conventional, non-nuclear firepower.
Even as the gap between US and Chinese strategic capabilities appears to be narrowing, the US is extending its superiority in one important category: strategic counterforce with conventional missiles.
Counterforce is a doctrine often...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.scmp.com/opinion/world-opinion/article/3282487/us-china-russia-strategic-stability-hangs-balance?utm_source=rss_feed</guid>
      <link>https://www.scmp.com/opinion/world-opinion/article/3282487/us-china-russia-strategic-stability-hangs-balance?utm_source=rss_feed</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <title>US-China-Russia strategic stability hangs in the balance</title>
      <enclosure length="2728" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/canvas/2024/10/17/21cdcce2-bfd2-43e1-a119-cd1f7419c9f7_2dd53742.jpg?itok=o5J4cNSS&amp;v=1729154784"/>
      <media:content height="1618" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1280x720/public/d8/images/canvas/2024/10/17/21cdcce2-bfd2-43e1-a119-cd1f7419c9f7_2dd53742.jpg?itok=o5J4cNSS&amp;v=1729154784" width="2728"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>