Advertisement
Advertisement
AFC Champions League 2015
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Guangzhou Evergrande’s players celebrate in the ‘wrong’ strips. Photo: Xinhua

Getting shirty: Nissan’s fury over Guangzhou Evergrande kit switch

Car company suing club after they switched sponsors for AFC Champions League final

The car company that sponsors the shirts of Asia's newly crowned football champions has launched legal action against the club for changing their kit for Saturday's AFC Champions League final, the firm said.

Chinese-Japanese firm Dongfeng Nissan paid more than 100 million yuan for the season-long rights to Guangzhou Evergrande Taobao's apparel, according to Xinhua.
Huang Bowen’s shirt shows the Dongfeng Nissan sponsorship in the first leg of ther final. Photo: Xinhua

The official red shirts are emblazoned with the firm's name in Chinese, along with a car model number.

But when the team took the field for the second leg of the AFC Champions League final – when they defeated Al Ahli of the UAE 1-0 – the tops were instead labelled with the Chinese name of Evergrande Life, an insurance subsidiary of one of the club's co-owners.
Guangzhou celebrate their win. Photo: AFP

Dongfeng Nissan, a joint venture between China's Dongfeng Motors and Nissan of Japan, which is an alliance with French firm Renault, issued a furious denunciation.

The club “took the liberty of unilaterally changing and replacing the chest advertisement without our company's consent”, it said.

The firm had already rejected informal suggestions for the change, and only received a written request “one minute ahead of the game”, it added.

The decision breached the sponsorship agreement and damaged its rights, it said, adding it had begun legal action for breach of contract.

An Evergrande executive said that the club asked Dongfeng Nissan to negotiate over the kit change 10 days before the match but received no response.

A statement had been prepared “but we have so far refrained from publishing it because we don't want the issue to be blown out of proportion”, the executive added, hoping that “friendly consultations” could settle the issue.

Post