Tiger Woods wouldn’t have dominated the likes of Bryson DeChambeau the way he did in his pomp
- Tiger Woods dominated golf to an unprecedented degree between 1997 and 2008
- He surely still would have been a great, but perhaps not so dominant
As we watched the Arnold Palmer Invitational weekend leader boards that included some of the top young players in the world, including the hulked-up, bulked-up tournament winner Bryson DeChambeau, it should be increasingly clear that there will never be another Tiger Woods.
In fact, if tournament fields were as young and deep a quarter-century ago as they are today, not even Tiger Woods would have become the Tiger Woods as we now know him: the transcendent golfer who has racked up 15 majors and 82 PGA Tour victories in his career. Of course, it’s all just speculation and I’m certainly not saying Tiger in his prime wouldn’t still be the best player in golf; I’m just saying that maybe he would only have nine majors and 50 PGA Tour victories.
Obviously, we could say the same thing about any iconic athlete of the past playing in today’s game. Would 2.08-metre centre Bill Russell, a dominant defender who was challenged offensively, have won 11 NBA championships in today’s bombs-away NBA game? Of course not.
Would Babe Ruth have dominated baseball if he had played in the days after the game integrated? Not a chance.
The reason we bring this up is because the fields in golf are deeper and more talented than they’ve ever been, but there seems to be this misinformed narrative that something is missing. There seems to be this underlying criticism among sports fans that current players simply don’t win enough.
There’s a reason for that: because it’s harder to win now than it’s ever been. It’s more difficult to get to the top and stay on top than at any time in the history of the game.
“No stone is left unturned now from these kids,” said 47-year-old Lee Westwood, who battled the 27-year-old DeChambeau to the final hole on Sunday before losing by a stroke. “They have got trainers, dietitians, massage therapists, people taking them to the gym to do the right exercises to be specific for their golf swing.”
Said Joie Chitwood, the tournament director of the Arnold Palmer Invitational: “I will tell you what has blown me away is the credentials of these young golfers. I think the talent coming into the PGA Tour is at a level we have never seen before, which only makes it that much tougher to succeed or win. It doesn’t matter if you’re ranked No 1, No 50 or No 100, you can win on any given day.”
If you want to know how hard it is to win in today’s game, just look at two of the players who were on the leader board on Sunday at The Arnie – Jordan Spieth and Rory McIlroy.
There was time when Spieth was the ultimate closer and the man who was going to take the torch from Tiger and start dominating golf. Spieth won three majors and racked up 10 victories during a three-year span, but he saw the talent on the tour getting younger and hitting the ball farther and, so, he started tinkering with his swing to gain some length. Now he’s gone nearly four years without a victory.
McIlroy, starting at the age of 21, won four majors during a three-year stretch from 2011 to 2014 and he, too, was going to be the heir apparent to Tiger. While he is still one of the top players in the world, Rory hasn’t won a major in seven years and has gone 16 months without any victory whatsoever.
The year before Tiger arrived on the PGA Tour, 37-year-old Tom Lehman was the leading money winner and six of the top-10 money leaders were 35 or older and only three were in their 20s. Right now, there is only one 35-or-older golfer (Dustin Johnson) among the top 10 of the PGA Tour money list while six are in their 20s.
It’s fascinating to wonder if Tiger would be able to dominate this young, new breed of athletic golfers. It’s not just coincidence that Tiger has won only one major in the last dozen years. Yes, injuries have hurt his chances of winning but so, too, have the fearless, young, technologically advanced robo-golfers on tour today.
Let’s face it, Tiger didn’t have to deal with players like the 1.85m, 111kg DeChambeau hitting 380-yard drives over lakes as he did on No 6 on Sunday. Arnold Palmer himself used to say, “You must play boldly to win.” It seems DeChambeau and today’s daring young guns live by those words even more than the golfers of Arnie’s era.
“I do get myself in trouble sometimes with the length I hit it and where I hit it, but I would say that Mr Palmer probably would like it,” DeChambeau said with a smile splashed across his face.
Even Tiger himself must love the way DeChambeau prepares and plays. He texted DeChambeau on Sunday morning, presumably from the LA hospital where he is still recovering from serious injuries after a horrific car accident in late February.
There’s no doubt that Tiger recognises the influence he has had on young players such as DeChambeau. Before Tiger, there simply wasn’t an emphasis among most golfers to hit the gym, work out and stay in shape. On today’s PGA Tour, just about everybody is in the gym almost as much as they’re on the range.
Even Westwood, at 47, has embraced going to gym and doing bench presses, squats and dead lifts. Earlier in his career, the only thing he lifted was pints of Guinness, but now he has become a fitness freak.
“I think golfers are more knowledgeable now about technique and technology.” Westwood said. “I mean, I could get some stick for it, but I think in general players are more professional now and analyse the game more. The kids today have learned from what Tiger did.”
There’s no question, Tiger Woods in his prime would still be one of the greatest golfers of all time, but he wouldn’t be nearly as dominant if he were competing against the physically and mentally superior breed of young golfers that he inspired.
Mike Bianchi
