Advertisement
Advertisement
Sun Yang
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Sun Yang before his public hearing at the Court of Arbitration for Sport appeal filed by Wada in November, 2019, in Montreux, Switzerland. Photo: Reuters

Sun Yang right to feel unfairly treated by CAS panel, Australian anti-doping lawyer says ahead of new hearing

  • University of Canberra assistant professor Catherine Ordway says anyone in Sun’s shoes would feel the process was working against them
  • China’s three-time Olympic gold medallist will try to save his career when new Court of Arbitration for Sport panel hears his case on May 24
Sun Yang

Chinese superstar Sun Yang is right to feel he was treated unfairly by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) at his hearing in November 2019, an Australian anti-doping lawyer said.

Catherine Ordway, assistant professor at the University of Canberra, said those who watched the live-streamed hearing that resulted in an eight-year doping ban for Sun – subsequently reversed – would feel the system was working against him.

The 29-year-old triple Olympic champion will try to save his career on May 24 when the case filed by the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) returns to CAS after the Swiss Federal Tribunal upheld his appeal in December. It found that one of the three CAS panellists may have been biased against Chinese people based on past social media posts.

“It is very clear that Sun Yang has concerns that he has been treated unfairly: in the doping control process in question, and through the hearings in CAS,” Ordway told the Post via email.

“In a rare display of transparency, the CAS agreed to his request that the hearing be made public and live-streamed. Anyone on that stream, or who has watched it later, cannot help but put themselves in the shoes of the athlete and feel that the process was against him.”

The CAS tribunal in Montreux, Switzerland, was made public at the request of Sun, who said he had nothing to hide and who wanted a transparent hearing. The proceedings, though, were blighted by translation problems, with the original interpreter – chosen by Sun’s legal team – replaced halfway through by a Wada official.

Catherine Ordway, assistant professor at University of Canberra, is an anti-doping expert and advocate for sporting integrity. Photo: Handout

The case stems from an incident in September 2018 when three testers arrived at Sun’s house in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province. Sun, once called a “drug cheat” by his Australian rival Mack Horton, had agreed to the test and provided blood samples before one of the testers took a picture of the swimmer, who then became suspicious.

Sun Yang not at China Nationals but could still swim at Tokyo 2020

Sun again asked for identification and only the lead tester was able to provide the correct papers. After asking his doctor to come to his house and consulting Chinese swimming officials, Sun refused to complete the test. The testers declined to leave any equipment behind, prompting Sun’s security guard to smash the blood vial to allow the team to retrieve the shards of glass.

Swimming body Fina gave Sun a warning but Wada took the case to CAS, which found him guilty and handed him an eight-year ban in February 2020.

Sun Yang celebrates his victory in the men’s 400m freestyle at the 2019 world championships in Gwangju, South Korea. Photo: EPA
However, the Swiss court sent the case back to CAS after one of the Italian panellists, Franco Frattini, was found to have a history of posting anti-Chinese comments on social media.

Switzerland’s Hans Nater will preside over Sun’s second hearing and will be joined by France’s Jan Paulsson and Belgian Bernard Hanotiau.

“Athletes not fluent in the official CAS languages of French or English are at a distinct disadvantage,” said Ordway. “Reliance on translators is challenging in the best of circumstances. Unfortunately in this case, the translators’ skills were inadequate for the requirements of a highly specialised and complex sport arbitration.

“The all-male arbitrators from European countries were not Mandarin speakers. As the Swiss Federal Tribunal established in December 2020, and as other commentators [investigative reporter Rick Sterling] have argued, the perception of a professional and/or personal bias against the Chinese athlete was palpable.

Sun Yang gestures to bronze medallist Duncan Scott after the Briton refused to share the podium with the Chinese swimmer at the 2019 world championships. Photo: AP

“Sun Yang has been given an another opportunity to argue against his eight-year ban this month. Whether he will receive a fair hearing before CAS this time remains to be seen.”

Although a new panel will hear Sun’s case, there are concerns that CAS had not assigned a Mandarin speaker despite having several registered arbitrators fluent in the language.

What does the latest ruling mean for Sun Yang’s Olympic hopes?

Sun won gold in the 400m and 1,500m freestyle events at the 2012 London Games, setting a 1,500m world record of 14:31.02. He claimed his third gold, in the 200m, in Rio 2016. He is also an 11-time world champion.

At the 2019 worlds in Gwangju, South Korea, British bronze medallist Duncan Scott refused to share the podium with Sun after the Chinese swimmer won the 200m freestyle. Two days earlier, Horton declined to mount the podium after finishing second to Sun in the 400m freestyle.

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Sun Yang ‘right to feel unfairly treated’
1