Cracks appearing: Olympic movement divided as Russia escapes blanket doping ban ahead of Rio Games
International Olympic Committee’s decision not to ban Russia from the Games over state-run doping divides international sports leaders
International Olympic Committee’s decision not to ban Russia from the Rio Games over state-run doping divided international sports leaders Sunday with the opening ceremony 12 days away.
The decision sparked an immediate backlash from groups that had demanded bold action against cheating.
But others backed the IOC view, explained by president Thomas Bach, that a historic outright ban would trample the rights of clean Russian athletes hoping to compete.
Individual sports federations will have primary responsibility for determining every Russian athlete’s eligibility for Rio, the IOC executive said.
Bach insisted that strict checks put in place for Russians proved the IOC had gotten tough with a country accused of running a vast doping programme.
United States anti-doping chief Travis Tygart, one of many who urged a total ban against Russia, blasted the IOC for creating “a confusing mess.”
“In response to the most important moment for clean athletes and the integrity of the Olympic Games, the IOC has refused to take decisive leadership,” the Usada boss said in a statement.
Drug Free Sport New Zealand chief executive Graeme Steel blasted the IOC’s decision to “pass the hot potato to international federations”.
WADA acknowledges IOC decision on Russia, stands by Agency’s Executive Committee recommendations: https://t.co/sEJyjNauzk
— WADA (@wada_ama) July 24, 2016
But some of those federations and other sports leaders were pleased with the decision.
Fina, global governing body for swimming spoke out ahead of the meeting against blanket ban as did countries like Italy and others closer to Russia.
Pat Hickey, president of the European Olympic Committees, said the group “completely supports” the IOC decision which will “enable the participation of clean Russian athletes at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games, just days away”.
The Association of National Olympic Committees also backed the IOC, with ANOC president Sheikh Ahmad Al-Fahad Al-Sabah saying an all-out ban “would have unfairly punished many clean athletes”.
“ANOC commends the IOC for favouring individual justice over collective responsibility and giving International Federations responsibility to ensure clean competitions in their sports at Rio 2016,” he said.
The IOC faced global pressure to act after a World Anti-Doping Agency report last week detailed a cheating programme directed by the Russian sports ministry with help from the FSB state intelligence agency.
The cheating affected 30 sports, including at the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics and other major events, Wada said, in revelations that widened the worst drug scandal in Olympic history.
Wada officials, who had recommended a Russia ban in the wake of the report, said they were “disappointed” with an IOC decision that director general Olivier Niggli said would “inevitably lead to a lack of harmonisation, potential challenges and lesser protection for clean athletes”.
Russia’s entire track and field squad has already been barred from Rio following a similar Wada report on “state-supported” doping in that sport.
Fourteen national anti-doping agencies – including the US, Germany and Japan – as well as several national Olympic committees had demanded Russia’s exclusion from Rio.
Others, especially top political leaders in Moscow, insisted collective punishment would be unjust.
Bach said the IOC decision considered the severity of the misconduct while also sending “a message of encouragement to clean Russian athletes.”
Full statement from USADA, CEO, Travis T. Tygart on today's IOC decision: pic.twitter.com/ANvBWOoyPP
— USADA (@usantidoping) July 24, 2016
“This may not please everybody, but this result is one which is respecting the rules of justice and all the clean athletes all over the world,” he said.
Russian sports minister Vitaly Mutko – a key player in the Wada report who has been banned from Rio – hailed the IOC’s “objective” decision.
Separately, an IOC ethics commission ruled that 800m runner Yuliya Stepanova, who turned whistleblower on doping in Russian athletics, could not go to Rio even as a neutral – a decision that both Wada and Usada denounced as likely to discourage others from coming forward.
The IOC executive implemented what Bach termed a rigorous set of criteria for each Russian Olympic hopeful.
First, athletes must be individually cleared by their respective sports federation and there should be no presumption of innocence.
An expert from the Court of Arbitration for Sport must also approve each individual decision.
Additionally, any athlete who has previously tested positive for doping is ineligible, even if they have already served their suspension.
Finally, no athletes named in the Wada report put together by Canadian law professor Richard McLaren are eligible.
But the complex screening process must be carried out for the 387 athletes nominated for Rio by the Russian Olympic Committee (ROC) before the Games start on August 5.
“This is a very ambitious timeline, but we had no choice,” Bach said.
Russians “have to clear the highest hurdles in order to have chance to compete in the Olympic games,” he added.
Immediately following the IOC announcement, the International Tennis Federation said eight players already met the eligibility requirements.
Mutko told the R-Sport news agency he was “absolutely sure that the majority of the Russian team will meet the criteria.”