‘Awful’ decision to award 2029 Asian Winter Games to Saudi Arabia highlights worsening environment for major events
- Downhill skiing silver medallist Johan Cleary criticises decision to host event in the Middle East
- Expert says Saudi motive ‘purely economic’ and highlights a logic that does not care about the environment
The decision to award the 2029 Asian Winter Games to Saudi Arabia may have been greeted with amazement but it follows a double logic.
For the biggest events, hosts are becoming harder to find than snowstorms in the Arabian Desert. For those willing to undertake the task, the appeal of major sports competitions is as national showcases.
It is difficult to imagine a more spectacular contrast than between the Japanese powder of Sapporo, site of the 1972 Winter Olympics as well as the first Asian Winter Games in 1986 and the most recent in 2017 and the mountainous desert of Trojena, 50 kilometres from the coast of the Red Sea.
“It is awful for our sport,” Olympic downhill silver medallist Johan Clarey told French radio.
The secretary general of the International Ski and Snowboard Federation, Michel Vion, said he was “surprised” by the decision of the Olympic Council of Asia (OCA).
It is not a first in the Gulf.
Yet the Saudi project, in an era of global warming, raises a host of issues: from the expected temperatures to the energy impact, including the detour of local water resources and the construction of completely artificial ski slopes.
The rivalry with the Qatari and Emirati neighbours, regional pioneers in sports diplomacy, remains constantly in the background.
Yet the objective of Asian Games is “above all economic”, Raphael Le Magoariec, a specialist in the geopolitics of the sport of the Gulf countries at the University of Tours, told AFP.
Riyadh “mainly wants to promote its city of the future, Neom,” he said.
Neom is a planned half-a-trillion dollar futuristic megacity. The Games would be held in its Trojena resort area.
“There are big unknowns about the snow, and even about the execution of the whole project,” Le Magoariec said, adding that the Saudis had already gained from “the impact of the announcement”.
He also said Saudi Arabia was “not seeking to speak to a European public” but to the wealthy in the Middle East, Russia, India and China, using what he called a “neoliberal logic” which is “devoid of concern for the environment or human rights”.
Ahmed El Droubi, regional campaigns manager for Greenpeace, told AFP the development was “trying to sell to those who already have homes”.
“Desalination of such a quantity of water would consume massive amounts of energy,” he said. “It will have to be consistently fed with water and therefore will continue to utilise massive amounts of energy on a long-term basis.”
That seems to make the OCA decision surprising, at a time when sports bodies are increasingly promoting the social and environmental impact of their events, scrutinised with increasing attention by researchers and NGOs.
But the lack of other candidates gave them little choice.
“The OCA cannot be too picky. They decided it was better to go to Saudi Arabia rather than nowhere”, Pim Verschuuren, a specialist in the geopolitics of sport at the University of Rennes II, said.
Japan and China, fresh from hosting the last summer and winter Olympics, have abandoned the Asian Winter Games after hosting six of the first eight.
OCA “needs” host countries “to exist politically and economically,” Verschuuren said.
The drought of potential hosts is not just an Asian problem.
The size and cost of major events and the hostility of the public in many countries, is deterring potential hosts.
The challenge is particularly acute for the winter competitions with their already limited geographic choices.
“The question is: which organisation will be the first to reduce the size and impact of its event in order to meet sustainability criteria,” Verschuuren said.
But the sports organisations remain like “big liners, which take time to alter course”, he said.