The Rational Ref | Vanishing spray a bit of magic applied with a dash of common sense

As if by magic, the sudden appearance of vanishing spray at the World Cup has instantly dispelled the myth it is difficult to introduce new and innovative changes to the game.

For decades, traditionalists and technophobes helped create the impression it was a lengthy procedure to get approval from the game's chief guardians, the International Football Association Board. The official body oversees the laws of the game and every year produces a new edition of the rules that is taken as the definitive guide.

However, the curious case of the vanishing spray - there was no real demand or controversy to bring it in - demonstrates that introducing new gizmos can be relatively quick, easy and painless. There was no requirement to obtain Ifab approval since there is no mention whatsoever of vanishing spray in the rules.

The fact it took over a decade to introduce goal-line technology means that was a complete red herring. Ifab need not be involved because technically the laws allow competition organisers the flexibility to introduce new processes or interpretations as and when they see fit. It mainly depends on whose political will is stronger.

Vanishing spray has been used for many years in Brazil and Argentina and also recently in the US because of the will of their respective competition organisers. The English Premier League's goal-decision system was due to the will of the FA. And the use of additional assistant referees who stand behind the goal line was due to the will of Uefa and motivated by its president, Michel Platini, who is known to be vehemently opposed to GLT and any technology used in the game.

In fact, any seemingly good idea can be introduced to competitive soccer provided there is enough support from the competition organiser. The Ifab has absolutely no influence in this regard.