TikTok must resolve other US restrictions after Trump ban is halted, legal experts say
- Four other prohibitions set out by the Commerce Department against TikTok have added more pressure on ByteDance to close a proposed deal with Oracle
- US District Judge Carl Nichols in Washington has ordered the parties in the TikTok case to confer by Wednesday on the next steps in their dispute

In his unsealed opinion on Monday, US District Judge Carl Nichols in Washington granted a preliminary injunction in favour of plaintiffs, led by TikTok, because the ban issued against the Chinese-owned app likely overstepped US President Donald Trump’s legal authority by blocking an information channel.
The latest court ruling covered the first US government prohibition, which would have banned TikTok from distributing and maintaining its app in the US around midnight on Sunday, because it was an “urgent and timely” matter to resolve, according to Wang Nan, a Shanghai-based lawyer who represents clients in cross-border disputes at global law firm Kobre & Kim.
Citing his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, Trump issued the executive order on the grounds that TikTok’s foreign ownership and data collection pose a risk to Americans’ personal and proprietary information, which could be turned over to Beijing.
A TikTok spokeswoman on Monday said the company was “pleased that the court agreed with our legal arguments and issued an injunction”. The Commerce Department, meanwhile, said that it will “vigorously defend” the Trump administration’s executive order.