Advertisement
Advertisement
Tencent
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Although Tencent Holdings is no stranger to litigation, the Beijing prosecutor’s public interest lawsuit is expected to open a new front for Chinese regulators to crack down on China’s Big Tech companies. Photo: AP

Beijing prosecutor’s public interest lawsuit against Tencent raises new concerns for China’s Big Tech sector

  • The Haidian District People’s Procuratorate in Beijing has found Tencent super app WeChat in violation of China’s Minors Protection Law
  • WeChat has formed a task force to oversee adjustments to be made in the app to comply with relevant laws
Tencent
A Beijing prosecutor’s move to initiate a public interest lawsuit against Tencent Holdings could open a new source of concern for China’s Big Tech sector, according to analysts and legal experts.
The Haidian District People’s Procuratorate in Beijing on Friday found the “youth mode” on Tencent’s ubiquitous, multipurpose super app WeChat failed to comply with China’s updated Minors Protection Law, without providing details of the violation.

“While the particulars are fuzzy, this is a clear signal to Tencent and other internet companies to safeguard minors online or be put in a regulatory hotspot,” said Michael Norris, research manager at Shanghai-based consultancy AgencyChina. “This could mean further restrictions for minors on their use and access of content across multiple media types, including games, social media and short video.”

It marked the first time in China that a local prosecutor’s office has directly and publicly targeted a major technology company for litigation. The Haidian District People’s Procuratorate has called on interested organisations to file their complaints about WeChat within 30 days, which echoes how US law firms would gather evidence for a class-action lawsuit.

02:28

WeChat: an app that runs apps including a fake news debunker

WeChat: an app that runs apps including a fake news debunker

Tencent said it would conduct self-checks and deal with the public interest lawsuit sincerely. The Shenzhen-based company, which runs the world’s largest video gaming business by revenue, declined to provide further comment.

In a separate statement on Saturday, WeChat said it has made a report to the prosecutor’s office and the relevant regulators. WeChat has also formed a task force to oversee adjustments to be made in the app to comply with relevant laws.

WeChat said efforts it has made “under the directive of government agencies” included closing teenager’s access to the app’s live-streaming page as well banning payments through credit cards and Tencent’s own virtual token QQcoin.

In addition, WeChat said it will step up notification in the app’s short video function, expand video content dedicated to teenagers, and impose a time limit and curfew for users in youth mode.

The country’s updated Minors Protection Law added a chapter dedicated to online protection that bans internet platform operators from offering products and services that may cause addiction.

While China has some of the world’s strictest gaming regulations, for example, that has not stopped kids from using creative workarounds to play their favourite games and rack up huge bills from in-game spending.

WeChat resumes new user registrations after ‘security upgrade’

Although Tencent is no stranger to litigation, the case is expected to open a new front for Chinese regulators to crack the whip on Big Tech companies.

“If the Procuratorate believes that WeChat’s rectifications have been effective and the public interest has been protected, the case can be terminated,” said You Yunting, a senior partner at Shanghai DeBund Law Offices. “However, if the Procuratorate decides that WeChat has caused losses to society, the case would continue and the Procuratorate can demand compensation from Tencent.”

Other interested organisations are expected to monitor closely how this lawsuit against Tencent will proceed.

In June, a children‘s rights organisation – the non-government organisation Beijing Children’s Law Aid And Research Centre – slapped Tencent with a public interest lawsuit, alleging that the internet giant’s blockbuster video game Honour of Kings violates the rights of minors by encouraging addictive behaviour and showing inappropriate content.

02:28

Tencent narrows kids’ playing time on video games labelled ‘spiritual opium’ by Chinese state media

Tencent narrows kids’ playing time on video games labelled ‘spiritual opium’ by Chinese state media

The Yuhang District Procuratorate in Hangzhou, capital of eastern China’s Zhejiang province, in December last year initiated a public interest litigation against an unnamed Chinese short video app for violating children’s rights by allowing registration and collection of data without clear consent from their guardian.

This Hangzhou case, dubbed China’s first public interest lawsuit on minors’ online protection, was settled in March after the defendant company rectified violations found on its platform, according to a report by state media Xinhua News Agency.
Chinese financial news outlet Caijing later reported that it was short video-sharing app operator Kuaishou Technology that was involved in that litigation. Kuaishou did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

China’s crackdown on tech sector could cool deal activity, PwC says

“Many public interest lawsuits, including the case with Kuaishou, were settled after rectification,” Shanghai lawyer You said. “Currently, antitrust actions against internet platform companies have become prominent, so it is still possible that Tencent will be ordered to compensate.”

Still, it remains uncommon in mainland China to file public interest lawsuits against a tech company. To date, China’s record of public interest litigation – which started in 2017 – has been mainly about environmental pollution and food security.

“Ultimately I think there has been increasing concern that technology providers are too powerful, and so any method to bring them to heel does not seem out of bounds,” said Paul Haswell, a partner who advises technology companies at international law firm Pinsent Masons.

Post