Mining bitcoin uses more energy than what’s needed to excavate gold, platinum or copper: study
- Mining cryptocurrencies requires hundreds, even tens of thousands, of linked computers running intensive calculations in search of the internet equivalent of precious metals
.png?itok=xML2J2Ym)
Extracting a dollar’s worth of cryptocurrency such as bitcoin from the deep Web consumes three times more energy than digging up a dollar’s worth of gold, according to researchers.
There are now hundreds of virtual currencies and an unknown number of server farms around the world running around the clock to unearth them, more than half of them in China, a study from the University of Cambridge has estimated.
Mining virtual currencies with a real-world value, in other words, carries a hidden environmental cost that is rarely measured or taken into account.
“We now have an entirely new industry that is consuming more energy per year than many countries,” said Max Krause, a researcher at the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education and lead author of the study published in the journal Nature Sustainability.
“In 2018, bitcoin is on track to consume more energy than Denmark,” he told Agence France-Presse.
Denmark consumed 31.4 billion kilowatt hours in electricity in 2015. As of July 1 of this year, bitcoin mining used up around 30.1 billion kilowatt hours, according to the study.
The highly competitive practice of mining cryptocurrencies requires hundreds, even tens of thousands, of linked computers running intensive calculations in search of the internet equivalent of precious metals.
New coins are awarded to those who complete calculations first, with the transaction confirmed and entered into the digital currency’s shared public ledger, known as the blockchain.
The top 100 cryptocurrencies have a current market value of about US$200 billion, according to the website coinmarketcap.com. Bitcoin accounts for more than half of that amount.
“We wanted to spread awareness about the potential environmental costs for mining cryptocurrencies,” Krause said. “Just because you are creating a digital product, that doesn’t mean it does not consume a large amount of energy to make it.”
The films, music and videos that billions of people stream online every day all have measurable environmental costs, earlier research has shown.
For the study, Krause and Thabet Tolaymat, an environmental engineer based in Cincinnati, Ohio, calculated the average energy consumed to create one US dollar’s worth of four top virtual currencies – bitcoin, ethereum, litecoin and monero – over the 30-month period up to June this year.
That amount was 17, 7, 7 and 14 million joules, or megajoules (MJ), respectively.
A joule is a unit of energy equivalent to the work required to produce one watt of power for one second.
That is up to three times the energy needed to excavate gold, platinum or copper, the study found. Of the metals examined, only aluminium – at 122 MJ per dollar’s worth – was more energy intensive.
A complete calculation of the environmental cost of virtual currencies would take into account the banks of computers used to mine them.
“The computers are made with gold and other precious metals,” said Krause. “They are run aggressively, which means the hardware is destroyed much quicker than you or I would expect for regular use – maybe a year instead of five or 10.”
