One in 10 people worldwide would switch to a mobile carrier that blocks ads
Survey also finds that more than a quarter of ad-blocker users would stop visiting sites which require them to disable the software
More than one in 10 people say they would switch to a mobile carrier that blocks advertising across its network, according to a study from media and technology research company Midia.
Midia surveyed 3,000 people in the US, Brazil, Australia, France, Sweden, and the UK about their digital content habits as part of its "Decoding The Adblocking Consumer" report.
Overall, 11 per cent of consumers said they would switch to a mobile carrier that blocks ads across its network. That rose to 15 per cent among people who already use some form of desktop ad blocker and to 19 per cent amongst mobile ad blocker users.
Of course, this is just a single survey and the question itself may have been the first time its participants had ever considered whether they could switch to a mobile carrier that would block ads. While there's no indication that consumers are yet changing carrier purely based on whether they offer ad blocking, the survey suggests it is at least an option some consumers would consider.
A number of mobile carriers are currently exploring whether to deploy network-level ad blocking, which would see technology installed in their data centers to prevent most ads across the mobile web and within apps being served.
Caribbean-based carrier, Digicel, was the first to roll out network-level ad blocking. Three, in the UK and Italy, is steadily moving forward with its ad blocking plans. Meanwhile, UK carrier O2 has said it was exploring technologies that could be used to block ads across its network.
From a carrier's point of view, ads can account for much of the data transfer of a web page — and their networks are doing the heavy lifting.
Of the consumers in Midia's survey, 17 per cent said they block ads because ad formats are "too intrusive" and 17 per cent said they block ads to save on their data plans, to improve browsing speeds, and/or to protect privacy.
The report suggests the best option for publishers could be to pay the ad blockers
Some online publishers — who stand to lose more and more revenue as ad blocker usage grows — have tried to thwart the effect of ad blocking by deploying their own technologies, such as denying ad blocker users access to their content unless they turn their ad blockers off.
However, Midia's survey shows around half (49 per cent of mobile ad blocker users/50 per cent of desktop ad blocker users) of ad blocker users will "always block ads" as long as they can. Meanwhile, about a quarter (26 per cent for mobile ad blockers/28 per cent of desktop ad blocker users) of ad blocker users said they would stop visiting a site if it denies access to ad blocking.
Again, this is survey data rather than an analysis of actual usage, but the report does suggest that publisher "switch-off" campaigns are likely to be met with "a heightened negative sentiment, which risks publisher damage."
As a result, Midia suggests that the best option for publishers may be the most "morally loathed" solution: Publishers should join the likes of Google, Amazon, and Criteo and pay ad blocking companies to get their ads unblocked.
Adblock Plus, one of the most popular ad blockers, charges big companies "30 per cent of the additional revenue created" by having their ads white-listed as part of its "Acceptable Ads" initiative. However, critics of Adblock Plus' business model have compared it to everything from "extortion" to a "Mafia-like advertising network."
My sister's unexpected death changed the way I'll save money for the rest of my life
Is ad blocking really as widespread as we think?
The ad industry wants to create a global regulator for internet ads