Advertisement
Indonesia
This Week in AsiaEconomics

Why is China being left out of Indonesia’s US$20 billion wealth fund?

  • Indonesia Investment Authority plans to launch soon, but it faces questions about its funding sources, make-up and intentions
  • Although the fund has US$9.8 billion in firm or soft commitments from foreign investors, China is notably absent from the list

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
22
President Joko Widodo has a number of ambitious infrastructure projects liked up, but can he deliver on seeing them through? Photo: AP
Resty Woro Yuniar
Indonesia is on track to launch its own sovereign wealth fund after appointing an advisory board and getting investment commitments from 50 fund management entities, but one country is notably absent from the list of potential investors: China.
The new fund, called the Indonesia Investment Authority, or INA, will be used to fund President Joko Widodo’s ambitious infrastructure projects, including tollways, ports, bridges and airports. Jakarta is planning to seed the fund, which is expected to become operational sometime in the first quarter, with an initial US$5 billion, with US$1 billion coming out of the state budget. The other US$4 billion will come from the transfer of equity and assets of state-owned enterprises.

Indonesia plans to eventually have US$20 billion in the fund, which will be used to prime the country’s US$1 trillion economy.

Five foreign fund management entities have either firm or soft commitments to invest a total of US$9.8 billion in the INA, but China’s absence has raised suspicions that Indonesia is trying to steer clear of investments from the world’s second-largest economy on fears that Beijing could eventually assert control over key Indonesian infrastructure, said Kevin O’Rourke, author of the Indonesia-focused newsletter Reformasi.

Advertisement

“Although never acknowledged, there is reason to suspect that a deep-seated reason for strenuous efforts to keep infrastructure activity under state ownership has been a latent fear that critical projects would be under the ownership – and, thus, control – of China,” O’Rourke said

“In any event, private ownership of assets faces scepticism, especially for infrastructure, especially given that the bulk of the private capital available for such projects would be foreign,” he said in the newsletter.

Advertisement

The Japan Bank for International Cooperation, which has committed US$4 billion to the INA, and the US International Development Finance Corporation, at US$2 billion, lead the list of foreign investors.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x