-
Advertisement
The Philippines
This Week in AsiaEconomics

Filipinos warned about ‘bogus’ scheme touting links to President Marcos Jnr’s planned Maharlika state fund

  • Philippine authorities warn that BBMII, which bears the name of the Maharlika state fund, is not licensed to solicit public funds
  • Filipinos are at risk of losing sensitive personal data when they sign up for get-rich-quick schemes, analysts say

Reading Time:5 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
1
People protest in Manila on July 18 to condemn the passing into law of the Maharlika sovereign wealth fund. Photo: AFP
Raissa Robles
Enterprising Filipinos have wasted no time in appropriating the Marcos name and image for get-rich schemes implying links to Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr’s planned controversial Maharlika sovereign wealth fund.

The schemes uncovered by This Week in Asia on social media platforms Facebook and YouTube involve joiners paying a registration fee or processing fee for an identification card to obtain the promised money.

The Securities and Exchange Commission recently warned the public against dealing with a corporation named Bagong Bansang Maharlika International Inc (BBMII), which references the president’s nickname BBM, or Bongbong Marcos, uses his picture alongside that of BBMII’s national director, Jovelyn Tibuasan, and appropriates the brand name of the Maharlika Investment Fund.

Advertisement
It comes as Marcos Jnr pledged to launch the US$8.9 billion Maharlika fund by the end of this year and dismissed reports that it had been suspended.

On its Facebook page, BBMII initially claimed the aid money would come partly from the wealth amassed by the late president Ferdinand Marcos Snr “for the future of the nation”, and contrary to news reports, the dictator did not die in Hawaii in 1989 but was still alive to this day. It later changed its story and claimed “a foreigner with a clean heart” was its generous donor.

Advertisement

The SEC said on August 24 that while BBMII’s registration as a corporation was approved on March 18 last year, it had not obtained a licence to solicit funds, give these away to the needy and undertake other social welfare activities.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x