Advertisement

New Netflix hit ‘Indian Matchmaking’ isn’t a hit with Indian matchmakers

  • Some say it promotes false perceptions, paints the country in an anachronistic light and focuses too much on traditional, orthodox views
  • Though for others the show holds a mirror up to the ugly side of arranged marriages – and there are fears it could be bad for business

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Sima Taparia, foreground centre, is the titular match arranger in Netflix’s new hit series 'Indian Matchmaking'. Photo: Netflix
A controversial new Netflix series that follows a jet-setting Indian matchmaker finding life partners for her picky clients has drawn criticism in the country of its birth for showing a sensationalised, one-sided view of the industry that some say casts India in a bad light.
Advertisement

Indian Matchmaking, which debuted earlier this month, touches on the centuries-old custom of arranged marriages and features Sima Taparia – the titular match arranger – roping in astrologers, face readers and marriage coaches to accomplish her mission.

The eight-episode series with its blend of romance, heartbreak and toxic relationships is gaining viewers not just in India, but also in countries like the United States and Britain, where there’s a significant South Asian population.

Matchmakers like Taparia, who charge between 100,000 to 500,000 rupees (US$1,330 to US$8,000) for their services, are often called upon in India to help find suitable candidates for arranged marriages. Some families prefer to run advertisements in newspapers, however, or create profiles on so-called matrimonial sites – a marriage-focused variation on standard dating websites.

Sima Taparia pictured in a screengrab from the trailer to the Netflix series 'Indian Matchmaking'. Photo: Netflix
Sima Taparia pictured in a screengrab from the trailer to the Netflix series 'Indian Matchmaking'. Photo: Netflix
Advertisement

The new series that Taparia helms, while leaving some viewers wanting more, has been lambasted by others for its portrayal of caste, fair-skin obsession and misogyny.

Advertisement