Advertisement
Advertisement
Indonesia's incumbent President Joko Widodo gestures during a campaign rally in Jakarta on April 13. Photo: Reuters
Opinion
Yohanes Sulaiman
Yohanes Sulaiman

In Indonesia’s elections, identity politics almost trumped the economy

  • In some areas, incumbent president Joko Widodo struggled to win votes despite high approval ratings and economic growth
  • The reason for this disparity boils down to disinformation campaigns and increasing polarisation, says Yohanes Sulaiman
Unofficial results from last week’s election show Indonesian President Joko Widodo comfortably cruising to re-election with 55 per cent of the vote.
While the “quick counts” from independent pollsters point to Widodo, popularly known as Jokowi, and his running mate Ma’ruf Amin winning the popular vote in 20 out of 34 provinces, their poor performance in several of the other 14 is surprising.
Voters cast their ballots at a polling station in West Java on April 17. Photo: Bloomberg
Credible survey organisations such as Charta Politika and Indo Barometer put Jokowi’s approval ratings in those provinces in the 65 per cent range, but it was his opponents – former general Prabowo Subianto and Sandiaga Uno – who received more votes.
This was a reflection of how identity politics played a part in the election on April 17. While Indonesia’s population of 265 million is ethnically and religiously diverse, about 87 per cent are Muslim. Jokowi lost badly in provinces that are well known for their religious conservatism, despite having Ma’ruf, a cleric, as his running mate.

Why Prabowo insists he has won Indonesia’s presidential election

The pair garnered less than 20 per cent of the vote in Aceh and West Sumatra, where between 97 and 98 per cent of the population is Muslim. They also won less than 40 per cent of the vote in South Kalimantan, Riau, Banten, West Java, West Nusa Tenggara, and Jambi – provinces that are more than 95 per cent Muslim, except for Riau, where the figure is 88 per cent.

Much of this, in my view, can be attributed to the success of efforts to cast doubt on Jokowi’s Muslim credentials. Since he became president in 2014, fake news and hoaxes accusing him of being a communist, Chinese and Catholic have abounded on social media.
These hit a fever pitch in 2017 when former Jakarta governor Basuki Tjahja Purnama, also known as Ahok, an ethnic Chinese Christian, was jailed for blasphemy. He had said people should not vote for candidates based on religious beliefs, but a video of his comments was edited and held up as evidence that he had insulted the Koran.
Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (centre), popularly known as Ahok, speaks to his lawyers after his sentencing on May 9, 2017. Photo: AFP
Ahok was Jokowi’s protégé and his downfall implicated Jokowi. Even after Ahok lost the race to be re-elected as governor, accusations that Jokowi was hostile towards Islam continued, mingling with allegations that he was too friendly to Chinese investors and migrant workers from mainland China.

Hardline Islamists painted Jokowi as an enemy of Islam, and used that as a rallying cry to mobilise support for Prabowo-Sandiaga – ironic considering how Prabowo was not known for his piety and Sandiaga has always positioned himself as a religious moderate.

Another Ahok? Chinese Christian faces blasphemy rap in Muslim Indonesia

These developments likely influenced more conservative people, and translated to a lack of trust and support for Jokowi.

Even strong economic growth, which has always influenced voters to support the incumbent, did little to dampen the spread of identity politics.

The case of South Sulawesi is instructive. Jokowi won there in 2014’s elections because his running mate was Jusuf Kalla, an influential politician and businessman who hailed from the province.

Jusuf Kalla (left) with US Vice-President Mike Pence. Photo: Reuters

Last week, he was trounced, getting only 40.7 per cent of the vote, despite the province receiving the bulk of strategic infrastructure investments in eastern Indonesia over the past five years and recording economic growth of 7.07 per cent – the second-highest of all provinces in that part of the country.

It is possible that Jokowi’s vote share did not fall below 40 per cent precisely because so much was spent to develop the province. At the same time, however, South Sulawesi has a considerable number of conservative Islamic voters who were leaning towards Prabowo, believing the hoax that Jokowi is hostile towards Muslims.

Can Indonesia’s new cybercrime unit win its war on fake news?

This, coupled with a split among local political elite – such as Jusuf Kalla’s nephew who lent his support to Prabowo – meant it was difficult for Jokowi to win in the province.

Similarly, in North Maluku where three-quarters of the population are Muslim and economic growth last year was 7.92 per cent, Jokowi only received 43.24 per cent of the vote. The province, which was torn apart by sectarian clashes between Muslims and Christians more than a decade ago, has grappled with ethno-religious polarisation ever since. Past research also shows that Christian majority areas leaned towards Jokowi and those with more Muslims chose Prabowo in the last elections.

In essence, while the economy is important, its influence was dwarfed by the role of identity politics in this election, with the opposition painting Jokowi as an enemy of Islam.

Prabowo Subianto (centre) shouts slogans in front of supporters during a rally on April 19, after the elections. Photo: EPA

The exceptions were Central and Eastern Java and Yogyakarta Special Region, where the moderate Muslim organisation Nahdlatul Ulama has the strongest influence. Since the defeat of Ahok, Jokowi has been courting Nahdlatul Ulama, and providing it with a lot of funding and support. In turn, Nahdlatul Ulama has positioned itself as an opponent of religious fundamentalists. And by turning out to vote, the organisation managed to bring Jokowi to victory.

How tradition, Nusantara Islam and the religious grass roots helped secure Jokowi’s win

The question is whether this kind of ideological battle will be unique to this year’s election, or whether we will see it again in 2024. In some ways, I think Jokowi is unique. But like US President Barack Obama, who was tarred and feathered with spurious accusations of being a Muslim, a Kenyan, and a Manchurian candidate, Jokowi’s humble background and the fact that he is not part of the political elite have opened him up to accusations of being a communist – and by extension an enemy of the Muslims.

So in 2024, we may see the issue of religious identity raise its head again, especially with the growing conservatism among Indonesian society. Presidential candidates will be asked to show their commitment to defend the Muslim faith. But at the same time, Jokowi’s victory shows that there is another path to victory, through building a coalition of moderate Muslims.

Yohanes Sulaiman is a lecturer in International Relations at the School of Government at the Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani in Cimahi, Indonesia

Post