bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

additionalInfoBoxes

quizIds

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Tom Holland

“Move fast and break things. Unless you are breaking stuff, you are not moving fast enough,” Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg once said.
Today Facebook is racing as fast as it can to break the global financial architecture, before the world’s big governments can shatter its existing business model.
It will lose the race.
Last week the US social media giant announced plans to launch a new “global currency” called libra. The idea is to use a smartphone app to create an international payments system for a new electronic currency, similar to bitcoin, to rival and even displace existing national currencies.
You can see why “Zuck” is going down this path. A third of the world’s population is now signed up to Facebook’s social media and messaging services. This has allowed Facebook to exploit users’ data to sell targeted advertising on a vast scale.

But the world’s governments are rapidly closing in. Just last week US President Donald Trump castigated European competition commissioner (and likely future EU chief bureaucrat) Margrethe Vestage for targeting Facebook. “She’s suing all our companies,” the US president complained. “We should be suing … Facebook.”
With its existing business model under threat, Facebook is looking for new revenue streams. And for inspiration it is looking at China.
China thinks it can weather trade storm. It can, but not for long
Specifically, it is looking at Tencent, and the Chinese gaming company’s WeChat Pay payments system. But while WeChat Pay allows users to send each other payments in yuan, Facebook is aiming to go a big step further, denominating its payments in a tailor-made electronic cryptocurrency called libra.
The name is unfortunate. Libra is latin for “pound”. In the last four years, the British pound has lost 25 per cent of its value against the US dollar. The Egyptian pound is down more than 50 per cent.
Here lies a problem. Facebook hopes to avoid the wild swings in other cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, and to build trust in its own crypto, by backing libra with holdings of assets in major currencies like the US dollar.

In this sense, libra will resemble the Hong Kong dollar, whose monetary base is fully backed by US dollar-denominated assets.
But while the Hong Kong Kong dollar is pegged to the US dollar alone, libra will be pegged to a basket of major tradeable currencies, presumably including the euro, yen and pound as well as the US dollar.
This means the value of libra will fluctuate against other major currencies. For ordinary consumers looking to pay for stuff in libra, the result will be that the libra price of goods and services – for example, a cup of coffee – will vary from day to day.
Hong Kong protests: ‘one country, two systems’ is good for business – and for Beijing
This alone will likely be enough to kill the new project. For libra to work, companies would have to begin determining the prices of their products and services in libra. And, to avoid volatility between revenues and expenses, they would have to pay their staff in libra.
But neither companies nor workers would want paychecks in libra. Both would still have to pay their taxes in national currencies, which would mean that they if they used libra they would immediately begin to suffer from exchange rate risk. The value of their libra income could fall relative to their tax liabilities.
In short, no one would want to use libra, because the moment they did, they would open up a gaping hole in their accounts.

Imagine as a US investor you bought US$10,000 worth of libra, and by great good fortune the value of the other currencies in the basket rose relative to the US dollar, the value of your libras would increase, say to US$12,000.
Now imagine you wanted to buy a speedboat. You would have to sell your libras for US dollars. As far as the US revenue service is concerned you would have to pay a capital-gains tax on the increase on the US dollar value of your libras.
This suggests the real problem with libra. Governments might talk up the merits of competition, but in reality they cannot tolerate competitors.
Trade war: the financial markets are focused on the wrong risk
Libra might be a good idea, but not enough people will use it, because the inertia attached to existing national currencies is too great. If you have liabilities in US dollars, you will target revenues in US dollars to pay your creditors. You don’t want revenues in libra.
Ultimately, libra is not the competitor to central banks that boosters claim. In reality it poses no threat at all to established payments systems. Governments will lean heavily against it as a potential competitor. And consumer spenders will have little incentive to take it up in preference to their existing choices. Zuck will have to try harder. ■
Tom Holland is a former SCMP staff member who has been writing about Asian affairs for more than 25 years


Diem, Facebook’s rebranded Libra crypto project, to launch US dollar-pegged digital currency

Singapore’s DBS not fazed by entry of digital banks, boss Piyush Gupta says

China’s digital currency not set for launch as trials are ‘just routine’, central bank governor cools speculation

China has its own digital currency, but what does that mean?

Facebook Libra

Why Facebook’s answer to bitcoin and WeChat Pay, libra, is doomed to fail

(FILES) In this file photo taken on May 1, 2018 Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks during the annual F8 summit at the San Jose McEnery Convention Center in San Jose, California. - Facebook is leaping into the world of cryptocurrency with its own digital money, designed to let people save, send or spend money as easily as firing off text messages."Libra" -- described as "a new global currency" -- was unveiled June 18, 2019 in a new initiative in payments for the world's biggest social network with the potential to bring crypto-money out of the shadows and into the mainstream. Facebook and an array of partners released a prototype of Libra as an open source code to be used by developers interested in weaving it into apps, services or businesses ahead of a rollout as global digital money next year. (Photo by JOSH EDELSON / AFP)

epa07655885 (FILE) - A person using Facebook on his phone at a cafe in Hanoi, Vietnam, 28 November 2013 (reissued 18 June 2019). US social media giant Facebook announced on 18 June 2019 its plans for their cryptocurrency named Libra. It is scheduled to rolled out in 2020. EPA-EFE/LUONG THAI LINH *** Local Caption *** 55144945

FILE PHOTO: A 3-D printed Facebook logo is seen on representations of the Bitcoin virtual currency in this illustration picture, June 18, 2019. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

This Week in Asia

Opinion

Economics

News

Asia

World

China

Business

Economy

Global Economy

Hong Kong

Hong Kong Economy

China Economy

Economic Indicators

Comment

Mark Zuckerberg is hoping to take on Tencent’s WeChat Pay and thinks he has found a way around the problems faced by bitcoin
He hasn’t: consumers will have no incentive to use libra, governments have every reason to oppose it


Mark Zuckerberg is hoping to take on Tencent’s WeChat Pay and thinks he has found a way around the problems faced by bitcoin. He hasn’t: consumers will have no incentive to use libra, governments have every reason to oppose it.


Digital currencies

Currencies

Bitcoin

China economy

WeChat

Facebook

Central banks

Social media

Technology

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

Abacus

Abacus | Why Facebook’s answer to bitcoin and WeChat Pay, libra, is doomed to fail

Mark Zuckerberg is hoping to take on Tencent’s WeChat Pay and thinks he has found a way around the problems faced by bitcoin He hasn’t: consumers will have no incentive to use libra, governments have every reason to oppose it

Mark Zuckerberg is hoping to take on Tencent’s WeChat Pay and thinks he has found a way around the problems faced by bitcoin

He hasn’t: consumers will have no incentive to use libra, governments have every reason to oppose it