If it’s goodbye to Chinese goods, then it’s hello to runaway inflation
- Consumers in developed economies like the US, Britain and Australia say they’re willing to pay more to lessen reliance on China
- The true cost of that stance may come as a surprise
By modern standards, this sounds so old-fashioned. Our clothes and shoes are cheap, smart TVs are being replaced every three to five years as ads and software updates gum up the works. I change my smartphone every couple of years, and consider it a victory if my white goods last six months longer than their warranty. I also have a drawer full of cheap mains power adaptors that I kept – just in case they prove useful – from electronic goods long since recycled. I have too much stuff!
Troubled Hong Kong, China’s gateway to markets, could prove too costly
LEARNING LESSONS AND REDUCING JUNK
However, if we stop importing everything from abroad and go back to manufacturing locally, we must be ready to pay more for everything as the cost of production will rise.
• Factories that do not currently exist at home will need to be set up;
• Local supply chains may not exist any more, so they will need to be re-established;
• The cost of labour is likely to be higher – though that’s not always the case;
• With higher prices, consumers will buy less and expect better quality;
• Materials and parts will need to be more durable to offer longer product life cycles.
So manufactured goods will cost more. The follow-up question must be if consumers are actually willing to pay the price? Surveys suggest they are.
05:59
Coronavirus: What’s going to happen to China’s economy?
GIVE THEM WHAT THEY WANT
This is bad news for big manufacturing economies, in particular China. And in defence of the Chinese, it is consumers worldwide who consistently have demanded cheaper goods and multinational corporations which have eagerly shipped jobs abroad. We have ourselves to blame for wrecking domestic manufacturing and becoming consumption addicts, Hongkongers included.
07:34
Australia and China cooperation too valuable for 'nonsensical' decoupling
SUPPLIERS ARE ON THE MOVE
Post-coronavirus, expect manufacturing to make a mass exodus from China
REBUILDING A SUPPLY CHAIN
As mentioned, moving manufacturing “home” will require supply chains to be rebuilt, and I recently came across an example which highlights this issue.
A British technology company with which I am familiar, Telguard, produces roadside “Help Point” intercoms. As they are “made in the UK”, they’re not cheap, but reliable and resistant to horrible weather. With every unit, a 12-volt DC power supply unit (PSU) is shipped with a moulded three-pin 230v British plug.
The PSUs are sourced cheaply from a British distributor at less than £6 apiece, a little under HK$60. They’re made mainly in China, Cambodia or Bangladesh. Often, the installer immediately cuts off the plug and wires the PSU directly; at other times, the whole unit is thrown away because the buyer wants to use something else like solar. It’s not great for the environment, but the product can’t be shipped without a power supply. At a guess, the PSU manufacturer in Asia probably sees less than £2 of the distributor’s price, and for that amount needs to make them, ship them and eke out a profit. So understandably, they are unlikely to be a top-quality part, and can malfunction from time to time – just what you don’t want in a critical roadside Help Point.
On the request of a Singaporean client wanting to buy British for reliability, Telguard recently tried to source a PSU made in Britain. It found there were no manufacturers of such units anywhere in the country, or indeed in Europe. Imagine the shock! At that point, Telguard looked into making one from scratch, but found it was impossible to make such units for less than £30 – five times the price they currently pay. Making that one component in Britain would add several per cent to the overall price of the product, but on the other hand the PSUs wouldn’t have to be shipped from Asia to Britain and then back to Asia again.
05:02
Coronavirus backlash further fraying China’s ties to global economy
WHEN WILL WE FEEL IT?
The cost of logistics is a key component in the final price of goods, and that cost is sensitive to fuel prices and volume. Commercial fuel prices have not collapsed but volume and capacity have, pushing the cost of transport up sharply – a reason for the shocking price hikes for imported food in Hong Kong recently.
Fuel prices will adjust in line with demand – not the underlying price of oil – and I doubt the demand will return to pre-Covid-19 levels. Meanwhile, operational costs like wages and rent, from manufacturing to retail, are unlikely to fall quickly, which will lead to further price hikes in finished goods.
Inflation is not yet showing up in economic statistics, and I don’t really have an answer for when that will happen, as we need to assume the data is disrupted; statisticians are currently using old price data for goods and services where no transactions have taken place. Prices for fuel have also been statistically unreliable, as the wild gyrations of crude oil and derivatives due to storage issues have distorted the overall picture.
Returning tourism won’t save airlines from coronavirus
At the retail level, British consumers have found that prices vary wildly across the country, and that even when oil prices collapsed, the price of petrol and diesel at the pump actually went up – petrol station operators had to pay rent and wages and built that cost into their final price per litre.
In sum, if we want to buy from local manufacturers, and pay a higher price accordingly, we will presumably consume less and expect the things we buy to last longer. Meanwhile, in the short term, the cost of logistics is unlikely to fall back to pre-Covid-19 levels. Combined, these factors will push up the underlying price of finished goods over the long term and drive inflation sharply higher in developed economies. ■
Neil Newman is a thematic portfolio strategist focused on pan-Asian equity markets