-
Advertisement
China Briefing
This Week in AsiaOpinion
Wang Xiangwei

China Briefing | Would China let the US teach American values in Peking University?

  • Like it or not, the notion of ‘reciprocity’ will increasingly come to define China’s relationship with the West
  • Chinese angered at Washington’s move against Confucius Institutes should ask themselves a question that sheds light on the meaning of the word

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
99+
A US flag outside the Chinese consulate in Houston, after the US State Department ordered it to close. Photo: AFP
As China and the United States try to reset their fraught relations, the word “reciprocity” will be a buzzword to watch for. After the four years of the Donald Trump administration, which made the idea of reciprocity the cornerstone of its policy towards China and pushed bilateral ties to a historical low, Joe Biden’s new government is also expected to frame its responses largely around the very same idea – albeit with different tactics.

As the principle of reciprocity will be an underlying catalyst that propels the relationship for better or worse, what remains to be seen is whether China embraces the principle and is willing and ready to reciprocate enough to get relations back on track.

So far, the signs are not clear. Publicly, Beijing has put the ball firmly in Washington’s court, blaming the US for driving the relationship to the ground on a wide range of issues from diplomacy to technology to academia to people-to-people exchanges. It also accuses Washington of ganging up with its Western allies on China without good cause.

00:41

US President Joe Biden orders new Pentagon task force to review China strategy

US President Joe Biden orders new Pentagon task force to review China strategy
The latest example is Britain’s decision this month to revoke the licence for China Global Television Network (CGTN), an international news channel owned by China’s monolith national broadcaster CCTV to operate in the country. Britain has tried to justify the decision with the excuse that it is ultimately controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.
Advertisement

Beijing has reacted angrily, calling the decision hypocritical and nothing short of double standards.

Wang Wenbin, the foreign ministry spokesman, had a point in saying that when CGTN was granted the licence to operate 18 years ago, the British authorities knew fully about its political affiliation. Its decision to use this fact 18 years later to take CGTN off air seems politically motivated and ridiculous.

Advertisement

For many people in China, that is another example of uncalled for provocation from Britain, which is forever in lockstep with the US in its efforts to contain China.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x