Advertisement

Opinion | Why ‘royal confessionals’ like Meghan and Harry’s Oprah interview threaten the British monarchy

  • From Wallis Simpson to Princess Diana, royal confessionals are all too often treated as inappropriate, oversharing and narcissistic attacks on monarchy
  • But stories that describe such critiques this way fail to recognise the importance of holding a powerful institution to account, says Laura Clancy

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
14
Britain's Prince Harry and his wife Meghan seen in a conversation with US television host Oprah Winfrey. Photo: Joe Pugliese/Harpo Productions/AFP
The Sussexes’ interview with Oprah Winfrey is shaping up to be the most published critique of the British monarchy in years. In it, Meghan confessed her suicidal feelings while pregnant as well as claims that someone in the royal family questioned how dark Archie – her son with Prince Harry – would be. In much of the commentary, the interview has been framed as an attack on the royal family. But royalist demands that Meghan and Harry should “just stay quiet” speak to longer histories of the politics of the “royal confessional”, and how people who speak out are maligned to protect the institution.
Advertisement

Royal confessionals have a long history. Marion Crawford, who wrote a book in 1950 about her time as nanny to the queen and her sister Margaret, was allegedly ostracised for selling her story without permission. Wallis Simpson, the American socialite for whom Edward VIII abdicated the throne in 1936, wrote a memoir The Heart Has its Reasons. In it, she sarcastically recalled the queen mother’s “justly famous charm” as a thinly-veiled critique.

Princess Diana’s BBC One Panorama interview in 1995 is perhaps the most iconic royal confessional. Diana told interviewer Martin Bashir about royal adultery, palace plots against her, and her deteriorating mental and physical health. Her infamous quote, “well, there were three of us in this marriage, so it was a bit crowded,” referring to Prince Charles’s affair with Camilla Parker Bowles, is still remembered almost 26 years later. Sir Richard Eyre, a former director of the National Theatre, claimed that the queen called Diana’s decision to tell-all “frightful”.

Princess Diana, Harry’s late mother, gave perhaps the most iconic royal confessional in 1995. Photo: Tim Graham Photo Library via Getty Images
Princess Diana, Harry’s late mother, gave perhaps the most iconic royal confessional in 1995. Photo: Tim Graham Photo Library via Getty Images

Common across all these examples is that it is women who use the royal confessional to reveal their experiences.

Advertisement

The “confessional” is often used in celebrity cultures to manufacture intimacies with audiences. Celebrities disclose something personal and reveal their “authentic” selves. However, as sociology and media scholars Helen Wood, Beverley Skeggs and Nancy Thumin note, elite, white, male celebrity confessions tend to be treated with gravitas. But women’s confessionals – particularly black women or those associated with “low culture professions”, such as celebrities – are all too often treated as inappropriate, oversharing and narcissistic.

All these confessionals are described in public and social commentary as attacks on the royal family. They were – and are – considered as erroneously and immorally exposing the inner workings of the monarchy. Commentators such as Piers Morgan have branded the interview a disgrace, asking how they could be so heartless as to call the queen and Prince Philip liars while Philip is currently ill in hospital?
Advertisement