Xu said learning English, or any other foreign language, was a waste of time and resources. It took up about 10 per cent of class hours, but was only useful for less than 10 per cent of graduates at work, he told Chinese state media.

Xu also argued that mobile phones and other smart AI-enabled devices could provide increasingly sophisticated translation services that could help students better than the current English classes which focus on rote-learning and exam-taking ability instead of improving students’ language communication skills.

Understandably, his proposal went viral online and generated heated debates.

Citing an online survey by the China Youth Daily newspaper, the China Daily reported last Monday that more than 110,000 respondents opposed Xu’s proposal and said English should be taught early to enable China to compete with other countries. But a similar number of people backed the idea and said it would be better to spend more time learning Chinese language and culture.

05:13

Chinese premier addresses Hong Kong electoral changes, US-China relations, as ‘two sessions’ closes

Chinese premier addresses Hong Kong electoral changes, US-China relations, as ‘two sessions’ closes

China’s success in containing the coronavirus pandemic and eradicating extreme poverty have further inflamed the sentiment as Western countries, notably the US, have stumbled in their efforts to bring the pandemic under control.

Would China let the US teach American values in Peking University?

Beneath the self-assurance, however, the Chinese leadership has tried to walk a fine line that allows it to play up China’s successes while ensuring that nationalism will not lead to protectionism and complicate its efforts to expand the opening up of the economy, which is deemed crucial for the country to improve the quality of its economic growth.

Since May last year, when Beijing first put forward the “dual circulation” theory, signalling a strategic shift in economic priorities, the central government has pushed ahead with the strategy, which would focus on its massive domestic market by boosting consumer demand and promoting indigenous scientific and technological innovation (internal circulation). This will be complemented by the external circulation which will see China rebalance its strategy from its export-oriented model to one that focuses on imports while boosting exports of high-value goods and technological products.

The significant shift comes as Beijing expects Washington to continue taking a tough approach to undermine China’s rise no matter who is in the White House.

The dual circulation theory has been fleshed out in the five-year plan for 2021 to 2025 and its long-range objectives, known as Vision 2035, both of which were approved on Thursday when the parliamentary National People’s Congress’ annual session ended.

But concerns have been rising within the Chinese leadership that growing nationalistic sentiment could muddle the efforts to implement the dual circulation strategy as localities have started to build up protective barriers to ensure their own internal circulation, and more ominously, some provinces and government departments have begun to grant generous government funding and tax breaks in a rush to close the gap in hi-tech production capabilities, without proper planning.

Already, a number of the government-backed semiconductor plants, including a US$20 billion state-of-the-art chip manufacturing project in Wuhan, have failed.

This prompted Liu He, a vice-premier and Xi’s most trusted economic adviser, to run a long op-ed piece on the People’s Daily in November last year arguing that the dual circulation strategy did not mean that Beijing tried to close the economy or achieve total self-sufficiency.

Xi himself is also understood to have expressed frustrations at a major meeting last year that the strategy should not be implemented at the expense of further opening up and a greater engagement with the international community.

Small steps by Xi, Biden could lead to big changes in US-China ties

Indeed, China should learn from its past costly lessons. In the early 2000s, the Chinese government under intense lobbying from a group of scientists pooled national resources to support and roll out the indigenous TD-SCDMA 3G network in a bid to set the world standard. It forced China Mobile, the biggest mobile phone operator, to adopt the home-grown technology in 2009, but the technology proved to be slow and unreliable, and failed to be adopted elsewhere in the world.

After five years and spending more than 200 billion yuan (US$30 billion) in the TD-SCDMA 3G network buildout, developing compatible devices and marketing, China Mobile in 2014 began to phase out the technology as it migrated to the 4G network.  

The costly lesson is still relevant today, as some Chinese officials and entrepreneurs are now lobbying the central government to set China’s own standards and specifications in high-end manufacturing amid the country’s bid to shake off its dependence on foreign technology.

But as Miao Wei, a former minister of industry and information technology, said at a meeting of CPPCC delegates last Sunday, China was still 30 years away from becoming a strong nation in manufacturing.

To achieve that goal, China must guard against rising nationalism and undertake more reforms and opening up to boost innovation and seek more international engagement, instead of being obsessed with setting standards which few want to follow and blindly pursuing self-sufficiency.

Wang Xiangwei is a former editor-in-chief of the South China Morning Post. He is now based in Beijing as editorial adviser to the paper