South China Sea: beware of US ‘sabotage’, Beijing warns Southeast Asia
- Diplomatic spats in the Philippines and Myanmar show the two superpowers are jostling for influence in the region as ties deteriorate, experts say
- US diplomats raise eyebrows with use of the term ‘West Philippines Sea’ and for warning Myanmar of Chinese ‘exploitation’
Observers said the spats were evidence the two superpowers were increasingly jostling for influence in Southeast Asia as their bilateral ties continued to deteriorate and that the pressure on countries to take sides was likely to widen even to those countries without claims in the South China Sea, such as Myanmar.
02:32
Washington’s hardened position on Beijing’s claims in South China Sea heightens US-China tensions
China has repeatedly rejected US accusations over its handling of the pandemic, Uygurs, Hong Kong and trade, and it has fired back at the Trump administration for undermining global cooperation and seeking to start a “new cold war”.
In an interview with The Manila Times serialised last week, Huang said that under the “pretext of upholding freedom of navigation” the US was recklessly infringing on other countries’ territorial sea and airspace and throwing its weight around in every sea of the world”.
He urged Southeast Asian nations to “properly resolve disputes” with China and “prevent them from being capitalised on by the US to sabotage stability in the Asia-Pacific region”.
The interview came just days after his American counterpart released a lengthy statement on July 16 entitled “The Philippines’ future floats in the West Philippine Sea”.
The piece hinted at deeper collaboration between the US and the Philippines in the contested waters and referred to the “West Philippine Sea” on four occasions. Use of the term raised eyebrows among observers, as it was coined under the previous Philippine administration of president Benigno Aquino III to refer to waters surrounding the Scarborough Shoal and Pag-Asa Island, which are claimed by both the Philippines and China.
Xi’s call to Singapore: a subtle ‘reminder’ about the South China Sea?
“US scientists and innovators are eager to join their Philippine colleagues in researching these waters,” Kim said in a statement.
“Through the recently ratified US-Philippines Science and Technology Agreement, together we are building new pathways to increased scientific collaboration in the West Philippine Sea and beyond,” said Kim.
The presence of Chinese research vessels within the Philippines’ 200 mile EEZ has long been a sore point between the two countries. Manila’s 10-year scientific agreement with the US signed last year could enable Manila to conduct joint research in waters which Kim called “the patrimony of Southeast Asian nations, the lifeblood of their coastal communities, and the livelihood of millions of their citizens”.
‘DRIVING A WEDGE’
That claim came after an article on Saturday by George N. Sibley, the deputy chief of mission at the US embassy in Myanmar, accused China of exploiting its smaller neighbour’s commodity industries and labour force.
Sibley said China’s new security law in Hong Kong and its actions in the South China Sea should not be seen as disputes that were “far away” from Myanmar, warning that such actions were “how modern sovereignty is often lost – not through dramatic, overt action, but through a cascade of smaller ones that lead to its slow erosion over time”.
US-China tensions: why is Malaysia so quiet about the South China Sea?
“Instead of demarcating fisheries, it takes the shape of unregulated banana plantations in Kachin State that thrive on forced labour and damage the environment,” Sibley wrote.
“Instead of spurious maritime claims, it takes the shape of unregulated investment and corruption in the mining and forestry sectors. Instead of island building, it takes the shape of infrastructure projects and special economic zones that pile on debt and cede regulatory control, and benefit China far more than they do the people of Myanmar.”
The Chinese embassy refuted Sibley’s statement on its website and Facebook page in both English and Burmese, saying he was “deliberately driving a wedge” between the neighbours. It was “selfish, hypocritical, contemptible and ugly”, the embassy’s spokesperson said.
“Over the years, the US has imposed sanctions on Myanmar in political, economic, military and other fields, which not only seriously hindered Myanmar’s economic and social development, but also greatly affected Myanmar’s exchanges with other countries.”
Jay Batongbacal, the director of the University of the Philippines Institute for Maritime Affairs and Law of the Sea, said the heated arguments should be seen against the dual backdrop of the trade war and the South China Sea disputes.
“They can’t say it wasn’t coming; they gave the US the perfect opportunity to do it by intimidating the rest of Southeast Asia.”
02:34
China hits back at US after Pompeo says most of Beijing’s claims in South China Sea are illegal
He thought this was the first time that a US official had used the term “West Philippine Sea” in an official statement, and that “adopting Philippine terminology” was a way of reinforcing “US recognition that these marine areas are under Philippine jurisdiction”.
He added that the US had recently said “an attack on Philippine troops ships or aircraft will trigger the Mutual Defence Treaty wherever they are”.
“The fact that they said this applies to the South China Sea, and now to the West Philippine Sea, means it will apply to troops, ships and aircraft within the area of the West Philippine Sea.”
Coronavirus grabs headlines, but South China Sea will be Asean’s focus
01:17
Philippine officials unveil beaching ramp on disputed South China Sea island
China is Myanmar’s most important trading partner, accounting for about US$11 billion in trade in 2018, almost double the next nearest nation, Thailand.
But there have been conflicts and disagreements as well. In 2018, Myanmar scaled down a Chinese-led deep water port project along the coast of the Bay of Bengal for fear of falling into debt. Relations were strained in 2015 by a flare-up in fighting between Myanmar’s military and an ethnic Chinese rebel group, with civilians killed by bombs falling on China’s side of the border.
“When negotiating energy, communications, or transportation infrastructure projects, Myanmar benefits when it is not burdened by unnecessary debt or exploited for strategic gain,” Sibley said.
China had a different view.
“The two sides are strengthening cooperation in the fields such as transportation, energy and production capacity, which Myanmar needs urgently for its development,” the Chinese embassy spokesperson said. “China is committed to promoting practical cooperation with Myanmar on the basis of mutual respect and mutual benefit.”