Just two days after the first high-level meeting between Indian and Chinese defence ministers ended with both trading charges against each other, a new point of friction has emerged between the two neighbours. Five Indian citizens from Arunachal Pradesh, the Indian north-eastern state along the border with China have gone missing, with their family members alleging that they were abducted by soldiers from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA). While the Indian government and army are yet to break their silence on the matter, Kiren Rijiju, the sports minister in the Narendra Modi government, said on Sunday night the army had sent a message to the PLA via a military hotline meant to defuse tensions and were awaiting a response. But asked about the incident by an journalist from Indian media during a regular press briefing on Monday, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said he was not aware of the matter. “China’s position on the eastern section of the China-India border, that is, the southern Tibet region of China, is consistent and clear. We have never recognised ‘Arunachal Pradesh’ [which is] illegally established on Chinese territory,” Zhao said. Zhao’s statement came hours after Ram Madhav, a senior leader from India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) attended the state funeral of Nyima Tenzin, a Tibetan soldier from the elite Special Frontier Force who was killed on August 29 in a landmine blast along the Line of Actual Control in Ladakh, where Indian and Chinese forces are locked in a tense stand-off. India-China clash: what is the mysterious Special Frontier Force? The funeral, held in Leh, saw members of the Tibetan community turning out in heavy numbers, chanting and waving the flag of the Free Tibet movement. The presence of Madhav, a BJP Member of Parliament (MP) and the general secretary of the party, believed to play an influential role in foreign policy matters, is a signal to China that India might be ready to play the “Tibet card”, analysts said. Madhav’s presence was significant, said Manoj Joshi, a distinguished fellow at the New Delhi-based think tank, the Observer Research Foundation. “The Indian government is stoking Beijing’s insecurities with regard to Tibet and signalling that despite formally accepting that Tibet Autonomous Region is part of the PRC [People’s Republic of China], the issue is not quite closed,” he added. This comes just days before the Chinese and Indian foreign ministers, Wang Yi and S Jaishankar, are expected to meet in Moscow, on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, in an effort to resolve the deep chill in relations. Thousands of Indian and Chinese forces have been locked in a stand-off in the Himalayan region of Ladakh at various points along the LAC since early May. On June 15, 20 Indian soldiers and an unspecified number of Chinese soldiers were killed in a clash involving hand-to-hand fighting, marking the first casualties along the LAC in over four decades. Despite multiple rounds of military and diplomatic talks between the two sides, the deadlock is far from being resolved. On Friday night, the Indian defence minister Rajnath Singh met his Chinese counterpart General Wei Fenghe in Moscow for over two hours, the first in-person high-level meeting between the two nations since the stand-off began. However, while the stand-off was restricted to the Himalayan region of Ladakh, the latest events around the alleged abduction of Indian nationals by PLA soldiers threaten to extend the stand-off to what is known as the eastern sector, along the Indian states of Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh. China-India tensions: will New Delhi play the Taiwan and Tibet card India and China are separated by a border in these regions, often called the McMahon Line, named after the British officer Arthur McMahon, who was instrumental in brokering an agreement between colonial India and Tibet in 1914. However, China did not accept the agreement and has claimed large parts of northeastern India, including the whole of Arunachal Pradesh state, spread over 83,000 square kilometres and the size of Austria. While the region is administered by India, China has disputed India’s claim over the state and instead refers to it as “south Tibet”. The dispute led to a full-blown military war in 1962. Since then, the dispute has festered and routinely manifests. China objects to high-profile visits by the Dalai Lama as well as Indian leaders. Earlier this year, Beijing said a visit to the state by Indian home minister Amit Shah had violated its “territorial sovereignty and sabotaged political trust”. The latest incident, which occurred last Thursday came to light only on Saturday when a local media organisation, the Arunachal Times reported it. According to the Arunachal Times , five youths from the Sera-7 area in Arunachal Pradesh’s Nacho region of the Upper Subansiri district were allegedly abducted by PLA soldiers, according to testimonies by other two youths who managed to escape from the scene. Taru Gussar, the superintendent of police in the Upper Subansiri district, confirmed the incident to the South China Morning Post , but said details were still very sketchy. “The families of the men abducted have, so far, not registered any official complaints and since the matter pertains to an incident across borders, the Indian Army is looking into it.” India-China border stand-off: military force key to national security However, a former MP of the Congress party from the district, Ninong Erring, said the PLA had made an incursion into Indian territory. “The youths were well inside Indian territory and despite that they have been abducted by the PLA.” Local officials told the Post that Nacho is more than 40km from the border. A similar incident occurred in March, when reports in the Indian media indicated that a 21-year-old youth, Togley Singkam, had been abducted by the PLA and released after nearly three weeks. Erring said these incidents showed Chinese aggression along the border areas was on the rise. “This used to not happen before. It has started happening recently and, worryingly, inside areas which are not along the border but are comfortably inside Indian territory.” Joshi, from ORF, also a former member of the country’s National Security Advisory Board, a group of experts who guide the Indian government on security matters, said Chinese claims in the area were not new, but could lead to a fresh row. “I don’t see any impact of the statement unless the government of India wants to use it to deepen the Sino-Indian fault lines.”