Advertisement
Singapore
This Week in AsiaPolitics

Singapore civil activist Jolovan Wham to plead not guilty over ‘smiley face’ protest

  • Migrant rights activist Jolovan Wham had held up signs in public on two occasions, including one which featured a hand-drawn smiley face on the placard
  • Public protests of any form are illegal unless they are held at Singapore’s sole free speech park with a police permit

3-MIN READ3-MIN
Singapore civil activist Jolovan Wham, clad in a T-shirt with a smiley face, at the State Courts on November 23, 2020. Photo: Dewey Sim
Dewey Simin SingaporeandBhavan Jaipragas
A Singaporean civil activist, once branded by authorities as a “recalcitrant” flouter of the country’s tough rules on peaceful public assemblies, said on Monday that he would plead not guilty to two charges of staging a one-person protest without police permits, including on an occasion in which he held up a piece of cardboard with a smiley face on it.
Jolovan Wham, 40, was not required to enter a plea in a hearing at the State Courts, Singapore’s court of first instance. The court imposed bail of S$15,000 (US$11,170) in the brief preliminary hearing. Wham arrived in court wearing a T-shirt and mask that were emblazoned with a smiley face. In the courtroom, he put on a shirt over the T-shirt.

At least two supporters were seen in the court’s public gallery wearing masks with similar smiley-face prints. Wham told This Week in Asia after posting bail that he “won’t be pleading guilty”.

Advertisement
Singapore civil activist Jolovan Wham, clad in a T-shirt with a smiley face, at the State Courts on November 23, 2020. Photo: Dewey Sim
Singapore civil activist Jolovan Wham, clad in a T-shirt with a smiley face, at the State Courts on November 23, 2020. Photo: Dewey Sim

“It is bizarre that I am being charged for actions that have not disturbed public order or safety,” he said. “It makes a joke of our constitution, which guarantees us freedom of speech and assembly.”

Advertisement

Wham also took issue with the court’s decision to increase his bail amount from S$8,000 to S$15,000. The amount was “excessive given that the charges against me have not been proven and I have been dutifully attending court and police interviews”, he said.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x