Advertisement
Advertisement
Singapore
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Singapore had planned for a futuristic-looking high-speed rail terminus in Jurong East. Illustration: SCMP

Singapore says high-speed rail link with Malaysia tripped up by disagreement over ‘assets company’, seeks further compensation

  • Transport Minister Ong Ye Kung said Malaysia did not want to appoint a firm that would operate the network and be accountable to both countries
  • Ong had previously said that the assets company was the ‘centrepiece’ of the project and was needed to ensure the interests of both countries were met
Singapore
Singapore’s government on Monday gave its side of the story on why a multibillion-dollar high-speed rail project with Malaysia was terminated last week and said the city state would seek further compensation from its neighbour in addition to the S$15 million (US$11.4 million) in abortive costs that Malaysia has already paid.

Transport Minister Ong Ye Kung said during the first parliamentary sitting of the year that a “particularly significant change” – that Singapore could not agree with – was to remove from the project a so-called assets company that would construct, run and finance the 350km rail network and its systems. This company would be accountable to both sides.

Reuters had previously reported, quoting people close to the bidding process, that companies from China, Japan, South Korea and Europe had expressed interest in winning an international tender to supply the train system and manage the network‘s assets.

Singapore and Malaysia abandon high-speed rail project

Ong explained that neither Singapore nor Malaysia had the requisite expertise in operating such a cross-border transport system, and hence both sides had agreed to appoint an internationally recognised company to serve as the assets company through an open and transparent international tender. The bilateral agreement that included this clause was signed in December 2016, when the Malaysian government was led by Najib Razak.

Although the two sides had agreed on a joint tender for the project, they ultimately never awarded a contract.

Ong said that to Singapore, the assets company was to be the “centrepiece” of the high-speed rail project, and that it was necessary “to ensure that the interests of both countries” would be protected and minimise “the possibility of future disagreements and disputes over the long duration of the project, lasting decades”.

Malaysian authorities did not officially comment on why they wanted the removal of the assets company from the project.

Malaysia and Singapore agreed to the rail project in 2016, with then-Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, second right, and Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, second left, witnessing the signing ceremony. Photo: EPA

MOUNTING COSTS

The first delay in the project came in 2018, after the Pakatan Harapan alliance took power in Malaysia and it negotiated a suspension of the US$25 billion project for about two years, citing the huge national debt incurred by Najib. It also agreed to pay Singapore S$15 million (US$10 million) for costs incurred due to the delay. The Pakatan Harapan government, led by Mahathir Mohamad, was subsequently ousted last March following a political coup.
In May, Malaysia’s new government, led by Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, requested another delay of the project to December 31 so that it could further discuss with Singapore its proposed changes.
But Ong said on Monday that Malaysia subsequently decided to allow the agreement to lapse, in light of this and other changed circumstances including Covid-19. 

Mustapa Mohamed, Malaysia’s minister in the Prime Minister’s Department who is in charge of economic matters, also wrote in a Facebook post on Monday that the coronavirus pandemic had forced the government to re-evaluate the high-speed rail project.

Indonesian tempers flare at Malaysia over parody of national anthem

He did not specifically mention issues pertaining to the assets company, but said that the 2016 agreement was no longer viable for Malaysia. He added that the government had studied the business model for such a venture and had proposed a new project structure to Singapore – one that is widely used around the world and which could reduce spending by around 30 per cent.

Following the termination of the project, Ong said Malaysia was obliged to pay compensation according to the terms of the 2016 agreement, and this would include “various abortive costs but not land acquisition costs, since the value of the land can be recovered”.

The Singapore government has in the past few years acquired at least two plots of land that were previously country clubs to make way for the depot and terminus for the high-speed rail.

In addition to the amount already received from Malaysia, Singapore’s government is currently verifying a “small component of miscellaneous abortive costs” that it says are still owed. Ong said he was unable to disclose this amount due to confidentiality obligations, but did add that Singapore had spent just over S$270 million in total on the project.

03:56

Can Malaysia strike a deal with China for its East Coast Rail Link?

Can Malaysia strike a deal with China for its East Coast Rail Link?

The termination of the agreement in no way means that Singapore has ruled out future discussions on the project, but such negotiations “should be on a clean slate”, Ong said.

He noted that there are about 5 million passengers that fly the Singapore-Kuala Lumpur corridor – the world’s busiest route, with 46 flights a day – every year, and the rail project was seen as a way to reduce the travel time from downtown Kuala Lumpur to Singapore’s central business district to 90 minutes from an average of more than four hours.

Still, Ong said Singapore looked forward to continuing building good relations with Malaysia, echoing comments made by leaders of both countries last week when they announced the termination of the project.

Meanwhile, media reports have emerged in the past month that Malaysia would proceed with its own high-speed rail project but would exclude Singapore, ending the track in Johor, which shares a maritime border with Singapore.

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: rail link terminated over ‘assets company’
8