Advertisement
Malaysia
This Week in AsiaPolitics

Malaysia’s ‘Azamgate’ escalates as Securities Commission contradicts anti-graft chief’s account of events

  • Regulator shifts stance on its probe into stock-trading controversy, undermining Azam Baki’s claim that it was his brother who made purchases at centre of the saga
  • While the commission says there was ‘no breach’ of the law, opponents view its latest statement as a ‘smoking gun’

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
6
Chief Commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Azam Baki.   Photo: MACC
Bhavan JaipragasandHadi Azmi
A stock-trading controversy involving Malaysia’s powerful anti-graft chief Azam Baki is showing no signs of fading, with the securities regulator tasked with investigating the matter releasing fresh details contradicting the official’s account of events.
With Prime Minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob not commenting publicly on the saga as it continues to escalate, political observers have suggested public and investor confidence in his already beleaguered administration will probably take a hit.

The Securities Commission – Malaysia’s capital markets regulator – had on Tuesday said its probe into alleged improper share trading by Azam Baki, head of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), was inconclusive. In turn, Azam issued his own statement framing the decision as conclusive and indicating the Securities Commission considered the matter closed.

Advertisement

But faced with anger from the public and government critics over its failure to offer further details about the investigation, the Securities Commission on Wednesday issued a fresh statement saying it had in fact arrived at the decision that there was “no breach” of the law.

It said Azam was in fact the “named account holder and had control of the said trading account”. The top graft-buster also operated the account “in that he had given instructions to buy, sell and transfer securities from the said account”, the Securities Commission said.

Advertisement

That pronouncement stood in contrast to Azam’s claims that it was his brother, and not him, who had been responsible for the share purchases at the centre of the controversy.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x