India seeks to become ‘Global South champion’, as US-China rivalry heats up in the Pacific
- PM Modi says India will be a reliable partner, as New Delhi banks on goodwill from historical links with Pacific nations to make further inroads into the region
- India’s interest in the region means Pacific nations now have ‘real alternatives’ to their development that are not dependent on China, one observer notes
After a bilateral meeting with PNG leader James Marape, Modi said on social media he had discussed ways to strengthen cooperation in commerce, technology and healthcare, and in addressing climate change with the tiny island.
Describing smaller Pacific nations as “victims of global power play”, Marape reportedly asked Modi to be the leader of Global South, a term which refers to developing nations south of the equator.
Rafiq Dossani, director of the US-based RAND Centre for Asia-Pacific Policy, said India’s interest in the region was part of its “ideological commitment to the Global South and helping fulfil its own ambition as a great power”.
US, Papua New Guinea sign defence pact at Pacific summit
This week, visiting US Secretary of State Antony Blinken signed a new bilateral defence cooperation agreement with PNG aimed at expanding Port Moresby’s capabilities and making it easier for the US military to train with its forces.
Dossani said India’s interest in the Pacific Islands stemmed from the large ethnic Indian population “commercially successful” in the region, such as in Fiji in 1879 when Indian labourers were brought to the country to work on sugar cane plantations.
“India’s recent economic growth has allowed it to transfer more resources than before to the Pacific Islands to support their development”, thereby earning goodwill that had not been earned by other powers in the region such as the US and Australia, Dossani said.
In 2019, India announced US$12 million in grants for developmental projects and a US$150 million concessional line of credit used for solar, renewable energy and climate-related projects.
“India certainly would want to be in that space providing an alternative to a number of these countries who do not want to be embroiled in this new Cold War,” said Pant, who has described China’s approach as “militarisation of its diplomacy” in the region.
In contrast, India’s approach had been more development-oriented, Pant said, adding that Delhi had also tried to project the voice of developing countries at platforms such as the G20 which it currently chairs.
“India can provide affordable, quality healthcare, education, IT, energy systems and more,” Paskal said, noting that regional countries had “real alternatives in their development, ones that aren’t dependent on China”.
Paskal said China’s engagement with the region often carried with it corruption that “results in a weakening of the institutions of the state” and was a “threat to democracy and the rule of law”.
In March, outgoing Micronesia president David Panuelo accused China of bribery and harassment, including coercion of government officials and stuffing envelopes “with money after a meal” at the Chinese embassy or after an inauguration.
“We are bribed to be complicit, and bribed to be silent,” Panuelo wrote in a letter to state governors and other political leaders.
By 2021, China’s direct investment in the region reached US$2.72 billion: 10 countries had signed cooperation pacts on the Belt and Road Initiative – Beijing’s global connectivity project – while PNG and Vanuatu signed belt and road cooperation plans, according to China’s foreign ministry.
Asia-Pacific risk analyst Kanchi Mathur, from India-based governance, risk and compliance firm WoRisGo, said the Pacific Islands accounted for nearly 28 per cent of the global exclusive economic zone.
“[The region is] one of the most important assets to major and regional powers of the Indo-Pacific,” Mathur said, noting that China’s expanded presence offered economic and strategic advantages which were of increasing concern to the US and India.