Japan faces ‘nightmare scenario’ as growing Russia-China ties could threaten US-led order

A Japanese security report warns that a contest between the US and a partnered China and Russia will ‘accelerate’ as Beijing, Moscow seek ‘non-democratic international order’
While Japan must step up to secure its interests in the Indo-Pacific, Russia’s war in Ukraine and economic issues mean it can’t yet have a formal security alliance with China, an analyst says

Japan

Julian Ryall

Published: 4:02pm, 27 Nov 2023

Why you can trust SCMP

A new Japanese security report has stated that China and Russia have a shared ambition of creating a global order heavily tilted in their favour, underlining one of Tokyo’s greatest fears – that the two powers may effectively become military allies.

The National Institute of Defence Studies (NIDS), a think tank affiliated with Japan’s defence ministry, last week released its China Security Report 2024, warning that “the contest between the United States and China-Russia over the international order will accelerate” over the coming decade or so.

It pointed out that while Beijing and Moscow had a more complicated relationship in the past, those ideological and political differences had been largely set aside to enable Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin to pool at least some of their powers to challenge the status quo.

China wants to deepen ‘everlasting’ good ties with Russia: Xi Jinping

Garren Mulloy, a professor of international relations at Daito Bunka University and a specialist in military issues, said the NIDS report echoed a number of recent white papers and studies in Japan in recent years, but was significant because “it has a greater degree of clarity regarding the non-benevolent characteristics of China and Russia in the modern world”.

Much of the report was focused on efforts by both Moscow and Beijing to undermine and ultimately upset the current world order, Mulloy said, with this now identifiable as an “approach that is more coordinated than in the past to change the extant rules-based order”.

According to the report, the two leaders shared a “common strategic goal” of creating a parallel international order, “based on the fundamental values of freedom and democracy”.

Chinese coastguard personnel take pictures and videos of Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) ships during the PCG’s resupply mission to the BRP Sierra Madre vessel in the disputed South China Sea. Photo: Bloomberg

It also stated Xi was showing China’s willingness to challenge the existing order by unilaterally claiming territory in the South China Sea and making similar claims elsewhere, not least against Taiwan. Similarly, Putin is pushing ahead with the war in Ukraine, while Russian naval and air units have been active close to Japanese territory, according to NIDS.

Most alarmingly for Tokyo, the report stated that Chinese and Russian warships and aircraft had carried out joint exercises in the Sea of Japan and also completed a joint circumnavigation of the main Japanese islands earlier in the year.

“Japan cannot allow China and Russia to create a non-democratic international order that tolerates unilateral changes to the status quo by force,” the NIDS study warned. “Japan must further strengthen the necessary defence capabilities to deter attempts to change the status quo by reliance on force.”

US, Australia, Japan would join Philippines-China ‘fight’, says analyst

A key element of the nation’s future security would be to “deepen multifaceted cooperation with the United States, which wishes to maintain the existing order and has strong deterrence capabilities, including nuclear”.

The report also recommended that Japan step up “economic and people-to-people exchanges” with the nations of Southeast Asia and the Pacific and use diplomacy with emerging and developing nations in the Indo-Pacific region to “expand common interests” – namely, protecting the existing international order.

“It demands that Japan take more proactive and independent actions to secure its national interests and maintain peace and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region,” the paper said.

Academic Mulloy said Tokyo was “alarmed” at the increasing collaboration and cooperation between the two nations’ armed forces in exercises close to Japan, although this was only part of a “nightmare scenario” for Japan.

“This emerging alliance is not the absolute worst-case situation for Japan to find itself in, but it’s a part of it,” he said. “The very worst situation would be this alliance developing and the US withdrawing its forces from the Indo-Pacific region.”

Despite the report’s gloomy outlook, Mulloy pointed out a couple of positives in the current state of regional geopolitics, not least the fact that Russia and China could not be considered a formal security alliance at present, and obstacles laid in the way of that outcome.

Ukrainian soldiers of the 56th Brigade fire a mortar towards the Russian forces in the Bakhmut region. Photo: dpa

Equally, Russia’s war in Ukraine and deep economic problems at home make Moscow very much the junior partner in the relationship, with Mulloy stating that while China was aiming to “displace many of the elements of the liberal international order and then replace them with its own structures that are less bound by international law and order, Russia does not have the strategic architecture in place to carry out” such changes.

“It is clear that Russia is more aligned with China than China is to Russia because Moscow has far fewer options and much less power,” he added.

In addition, the foreign ministers of Japan, China and South Korea met in Busan on Sunday, the first such in-person meetings for the three officials in recent years. While there was no immediate breakthrough on issues that have bedevilled bilateral and trilateral relations, the trio did agree to step up efforts to arrange a summit of their leaders in the near future.

“It was positive that Japan and China could find some common ground,” Mulloy said. “Japan can afford to let relations with Russia run down and reduce trade because it does not really have any impact here. But not having trade ties with China would have a far more serious impact on Japan.”