-
Advertisement
India
This Week in AsiaPolitics

India’s rights activists slam new telecoms law as ‘grave threat to fundamental rights’

  • The new law grants the government the ability to take over telecoms services and access encrypted messaging data for national security reasons
  • But activists point out a lack of sufficient legal oversight for such a move, and that the government could use it to ‘target political opponents’

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
8
A man checks his mobile phone while commuting in a tram in Kolkata, India. Photo: EPA-EFE
Vasudevan Sridharan
India concluded 2023 by passing a sweeping piece of legislation to overhaul the nation’s telecommunications section, but the bill – promoted as a means of streamlining the industry’s regulatory framework and eliminate bottlenecks in telecoms infrastructure – and the far-reaching powers it grants the government have sparked concern among rights activists.

One key aspect of the legislation – the Telecommunications Act – highlighted by activists is that it grants the government the ability to take over telecoms services and access encrypted messaging data for national security reasons. A lack of sufficient legal oversight or approval mechanisms for these powers has raised serious concerns.

The bill also redefines over-the-top services as telecommunications, subjecting them to the same government regulations as traditional telecoms services, and introduces a non-auction route for satellite spectrum allocation, among other provisions.

“This act is extremely troubling in updating a colonial-era instrument concerning telecommunications in India. It significantly continues [the previous act’s] powers and increases them in many ways,” said Raman Jit Singh Chima, Asia policy director and senior international counsel at digital rights non-profit Access Now.

Advertisement

The legislation has broad powers that could “be used to target political opponents and critics”, said Rahul Narayan, a partner at New Delhi law firm Chandhiok and Mahajan.

“Hypothetically speaking, the surveillance powers, its insistence on biometric identification before provision of services, and the attack on encryption all provide a powerful toolkit to target any person. Even anonymous speech would be gravely threatened,” he said, while noting that was a worst-case scenario and may not be the norm.

Advertisement

“Civil liberties require proper procedure and safeguards to avoid misuse,” he added.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x