-
Advertisement
Singapore
This Week in AsiaPolitics

A proposed Singapore law can keep serious offenders in prison indefinitely, but will it infringe on rights?

  • The Sentence for Enhanced Public Protection law is aimed at preventing offenders of violent and sexual offences from being automatically released at the end of their jail terms
  • While the government has stressed the courts will make the decision, experts say the law infringes on ‘open justice’ and raise concerns over how assessments of offenders would be conducted

Reading Time:5 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Under the SEPP, only those who commit serious violent offences can be sentenced. Photo: AFP
Kimberly Lim

Legal experts in Singapore welcome a proposed law that could keep serious offenders in prison indefinitely, but some have cited concerns that the legislation could deprive convicts of their rights, calling for clarity on reviews to ensure the law is used properly.

The sentencing regime, otherwise known as the Sentence for Enhanced Public Protection (SEPP) law, is aimed at preventing dangerous offenders in the city state from being automatically released at the end of their jail terms, especially if they are determined as likely to reoffend.

The government has stressed that the decision to put someone on the SEPP track is made by the courts and not at a minister’s discretion.

Advertisement

The bill, which is slated to be debated in parliament on Monday , will then allow for reviews by boards and for the home affairs minister to make the final decision on an offender’s release. While such processes are not new to the body of law in Singapore, activists have expressed concerns.

Activist Rocky Howe, an anti-death penalty activist, said the yearly reviews for offenders under the proposed legislation were a “severe deprivation of liberty and curtailment of rights”.

Advertisement

“The operation of the review process and the decision around when to release a person is opaque and lacks public scrutiny. This undermines due process, and increases the risk of abuse,” Howe said, comparing it to the Internal Security Act.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x