-
Advertisement
The Philippines
This Week in AsiaPolitics

Critics of Philippines’ Marcos step up impeachment calls, cite ‘smoking gun’ letter

An impeachment complaint against Marcos refers to the channelling of health insurance funds to flood control projects

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
2
Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr delivering a report on investigative efforts against corruption at a media conference in Manila in November. Photo: EPA
Raissa Robles
A 2024 letter signed by President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr’s Executive Secretary Ralph Recto has become central to a renewed attempt to impeach the Philippine leader over allegations that billions of pesos meant for public health were diverted into infrastructure spending linked to politicians.

Left-wing lawmakers and activists refiled an impeachment complaint against Marcos on Monday, accusing him of “betrayal of public trust” for allowing state health insurance funds to be channelled into flood control projects, which critics say functioned as a revived form of pork barrel spending.

The complaint centres on the transfer of at least 60 billion pesos (US$1.04 billion) from the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation, or PhilHealth, into projects funded under “unprogrammed appropriations”, a discretionary budget category that can only be released with presidential approval.

Advertisement

It comes after a letter written in April 2024 by Recto asking PhilHealth’s CEO to remit the funds, in which the then finance secretary referred to approval for the move at a cabinet meeting chaired by Marcos.

This Week in Asia first learned of the letter from Dr Antonio Dans, convenor of the Health Professionals Alliance and an emeritus professor at the University of the Philippines College of Medicine.

Advertisement

Retired Supreme Court senior associate justice Antonio Carpio has described that letter as “a smoking gun”, arguing it directly links the president to a transfer the Supreme Court later ruled unconstitutional.

It remains to be seen if the letter is enough to implicate Marcos and give momentum to the impeachment push against him. Last year, the Supreme Court ordered the return of PhilHealth funds diverted to the national treasury, but did not rule on any criminal or presidential liability.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x