South Korea’s Yoon awaits verdict as insurrection rulings mount: ‘the game is over’
Two earlier convictions have defined Yoon’s martial law decree as part of an insurrection plot, raising the stakes ahead of Thursday’s ruling
The ruling will test whether the court aligns with the panels in those earlier cases, which defined Yoon’s martial law imposition as an act of rebellion – a conclusion that will prove pivotal in determining his fate.
Special Prosecutor Cho Eun-suk’s team has argued that Yoon’s declaration of martial law amounted to an insurrection, alleging that he conspired with senior officials to deploy troops to the opposition-controlled National Assembly in an effort to neutralise it and entrench his hold on power.
They argued that his actions had caused “enormous damage and harm to the state and society” and that he had “never once sincerely apologised to the public”.