Coronavirus: Rapid home tests less accurate, more likely to give a false negative with Omicron, says FDA

Published: 
  • Early data suggests antigen tests have reduced sensitivity in detecting the Omicron variant
  • PCR tests are still recommended for those who test negative with a rapid test but have Covid-19 symptoms, or are close contacts of Covid patients
Agence France-Presse |
Published: 
Comment

Latest Articles

Coronavirus: Covid pandemic ‘nowhere near over’, warns WHO

China’s former athletes now teach fitness in schools in sport push

Government announcement leads to a rise in attempted hamster abandonment

Hong Kong international school fosters culture of giving with ‘free dress days’

7 commonly misused phrases in English, from ‘hunger pangs’ to ‘wreak havoc’

2,000 hamsters to be euthanised over fears of first animal-to-human Covid transmission in Hong Kong

According to the US Food and Drug Administration, rapid Covid-19 antigen tests may be less effective at detecting Omicron than earlier strains. Photo: Xinhua

Rapid Covid home tests are more likely to give a false negative with the heavily-mutated Omicron variant compared to earlier strains, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said Tuesday.

The news comes as the country is facing a massive surge in cases that experts say is being under-captured as a result of a testing crunch, with long wait times for the more accurate PCR tests, and home kits in extremely short supply.

In a statement, the FDA said it was collaborating with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to study the performance of home tests, also known as “antigen” tests, against patient samples containing live versions of the Omicron variant.

Coronavirus: US authorises Pfizer’s Covid pill for high-risk individuals aged 12 and above as Omicron surges

“Early data suggests that antigen tests do detect the Omicron variant but may have reduced sensitivity,” the agency said.

Sensitivity is a measure of how likely a test is able to detect a positive.

Previous testing had focused on heat-inactivated virus samples, rather than live virus which is better, and a drop-off in performance hadn’t been spotted until now, the statement added.

The FDA said it would continue to authorise the use of antigen tests – which work by detecting surface proteins of the coronavirus – and that individuals should continue to use them in accordance with the instructions.

For instance, some rapid tests instruct users to take two tests, a certain amount of time apart, to confirm a negative.

If a person tests negative with a rapid test but is thought likely to have Covid-19, either because of symptoms or their exposures, they are still recommended to get a “gold standard” molecular test – such as PCR.

These detect the genetic material of the virus. They are more accurate because they can make millions of copies of the virus’ RNA, so even tiny amounts become detectable.

Comment