Hong Kong protests: Student cleared of weapons charge after court finds police officer didn't give full account of arrest

  • The magistrate determined prosecution had failed to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the teen had a laser pointer and spray paint for unlawful purposes
  • Lawyers questioned why the officer followed the student, rather than people carrying iron pipes
South China Morning Post |

Latest Articles

Small, but mighty: how tiny are nanomaterials and why are they useful?

Review ordered after 1,500 passengers evacuated through Hong Kong MTR tunnel

Hong Kong school council chief pushes for smaller secondary class size

Underserved students receive HK$5,000 to improve their living environments

Wong Chi-yan (centre) outside Eastern Court on Wednesday. Photo: SCMP/ Brian Wong

Seventeen-year-old Wong Chi-yan has been acquitted of charges of carrying a laser pointer and spray paint during an anti-government protest last year after the magistrate found the arresting officer failed to present the entire truth about the arrest.

Eastern Court Magistrate Stanley Ho Chun-yiu cleared the student of two counts of weaponry offences after determining the prosecution had failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt the student kept must have kept the seized items for unlawful purpose.

Constable Mak Ho-san, who arrested the defendant, testified he intercepted Wong on Wyndham Street after spotting him instructing other protesters to flee. When Wong tried to get away, he and Mak fell to the ground, and the officer tied his hands and detained him.

Children's rights groups speak out about officer who tackled 12-year-old

Under cross-examination by defence counsel David Chu Po-tin, Mak admitted he did not witness Wong nor other protesters committing any offences at the scene.

Although he saw some protesters carrying iron pipes, Mak said he did not give chase because his focus was solely on stopping the defendant.

The officer further admitted he did not write down the circumstances of the arrest, before apologising to the magistrate for not remembering the details.

In his ruling, Ho cast doubt on the officer’s decision to prioritise Wong’s arrest over stopping the pipe-wielding protesters, who the magistrate said should have appeared more suspicious than the student who was merely wearing safety gloves.

Universities aim to protect students' rights under national security law

It was also unreasonable for Mak to omit Wong’s alleged offence of resisting police in his written record of the November encounter, Ho said.

“I have reservations about whether [the arresting officer] had told the court the truth of the incident,” Ho said, adding he found the officer an unreliable witness.

The magistrate cleared Wong of possessing an article with intent to damage property in relation to the spray paint, and possessing an offensive weapon in a public place over the laser pointer.  

Sign up for the YP Teachers Newsletter
Get updates for teachers sent directly to your inbox
By registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy