bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Orange Wang

Shi Jiangtao

After a week-long gathering of leaders at the UN General Assembly in New York, its president struck a positive tone on Monday.
Annalena Baerbock, the former German foreign minister, said there was a collective will to “choose the right path at the crossroads”.
“If high-level week is any indication, this house is fulfilling that purpose – the United Nations is still relevant,” she said.
But 23 years after Kofi Annan spoke of the UN’s “fork in the road”, when he was secretary general, the organisation remains adrift.
Concerns over its future were amplified last week after US President Donald Trump claimed the UN was ineffective and questioned its existence.

As the UN’s main architect, biggest single financial contributor and host nation, the United States has increasingly turned its back on the multilateral system it helped build.
Observers say a “leaderless” era could emerge during the second Trump administration as it comes under the toughest pressure it has faced since it was founded eight decades ago.
“It is sad and disappointing that the US is turning inward and emphasising ‘America first’ at a time when global leadership is needed to address serious challenges,” said Zhiqun Zhu, a professor of international relations at Bucknell University in Pennsylvania.
Zhu said although the US had come under fire for its hegemonic behaviour, its global presence had been a “stabilising force” after World War II.
“If the US continues to withdraw from multilateral institutions and international engagements, the world will become a more unstable place, with more regional conflicts ... and many global issues being unattended to,” he added.
Jennifer Parlamis, a professor of organisation development and leadership at the University of San Francisco, also said “America first” seemed anachronistic in a globalised world that faced threats like pandemics and climate change.
“I believe [Trump-era isolationism] does add to the instability of the UN,” she said.
Trump’s tirade against the UN last week continued for nearly an hour – well beyond the 15-minute limit.
He accused the organisation of “funding an assault on Western countries and their borders” with its support to migrants, claimed it offered little help when he was ending “seven endless wars”, and called climate change – which the UN has prioritised – the “greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world”.
“What is the purpose of the United Nations?” he asked in front of envoys from some 193 UN member states, claiming that all it did was write “strongly worded letters” and speak in “empty words”.
Since he returned to the White House in January, Trump has again withdrawn the US from the UN’s heritage body, Unesco, the UN Human Rights Council, the World Health Organization and the Paris climate pact, while Washington has stopped paying its bills to the UN and is in arrears for 2024.
The US president’s budget request for the 2026 financial year, submitted to Congress in May, would freeze virtually all the country’s payments to the UN.

Multilateral frameworks like the UN are being “increasingly marginalised, instrumentalised and hollowed out” in global affairs, the Beijing-based China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR) said in a report released on September 26.
“The UN is going through the toughest period since its founding,” it added.
CICIR – an influential research institution under the Ministry of State Security – identified four major challenges facing the UN, three of them directly attributed to the US.
It argued that Washington’s “unilateralist” moves had undermined the authority of the UN, that America’s unpaid dues had weakened the organisation’s ability to act, and that the use of veto by the US and Russia as a tool for confrontation had worsened the Security Council’s legitimacy deficit.
According to Zhang Guihong, director of Fudan University’s Centre for UN Studies, the US under Trump 2.0 was likely to reduce its engagement with international organisations as its strategic priorities shifted.
“In many areas of international cooperation and global agendas, the US is likely to be absent. This is an unprecedented new issue for the UN,” Zhang wrote in a paper in the Journal of International Studies that was published online last week.
Zhu from Bucknell University said Trump’s isolationist approach had tarnished America’s image. “Even if future US presidents wish to return to multilateralism and global leadership, it will take a long time to restore trust and credibility,” he said.
As the United States retreats from its traditional leadership role at the UN, countries including China – the world’s No 2 economy and the biggest provider of peacekeepers among the UN Security Council’s permanent members – appear to be racing to fill the void.
In New York last week, Premier Li Qiang pitched China as “a staunch defender of world peace and security” and touted its new Global Governance Initiative to reshape the international order.

China also announced that it would not seek special benefits as a developing nation in current and future WTO negotiations, a move seen as Beijing trading off economic privileges for greater global political standing.
Unesco launched its International Institute for STEM Education in Shanghai last week in another example of China’s growing influence in the UN. China will also partner with the UN to establish a global centre for sustainable development in the city.
However, Beijing has repeatedly said it does not intend to unseat the US as the dominant global power.
“Early indicators are that even as the UN enters a ‘leaderless’ era, China is reticent to accept the volume of funding, policy process management and relentless criticism that comes as part of the burden of filling the US leadership shoes,” said Courtney Fung, an associate professor at Macquarie University in Australia.
“It’s still unclear whether and how China’s new suite of global governance efforts – [the Global Development Initiative, the Global Security Initiative, the Global Civilisation Initiative] and the latest GGI – offer substance over more than symbolic criticism of a US-led international order,” she added.
Still, Beijing’s growing footprint has put Washington on alert.
Mike Waltz, the US top envoy to the UN, told Senate lawmakers at his confirmation hearing in July that he would prioritise “countering China” in the organisation, which he characterised as “critical”.
The strategic competition between the two powers now extends into global governance and international organisations, in particular the UN, according to Zhang from Fudan University.
He wrote that the US-China rivalry “over interests, institutions and values poses a formidable challenge to the UN”.
It comes at a time when geopolitical risks “exceed levels seen during the Cold War”, according to the Global Peace Index 2025 released by Sydney-based think tank the Institute for Economics and Peace in June.




That is being driven by heightened military spending, stalled efforts at nuclear disarmament, the diminished role of multilateral institutions like the UN and WTO as well as increasing competition among major and middle powers and regional blocs, the report said.
It also noted that from 2011 to 2024, the UN Security Council saw an increase in the use of vetoes and a decline in successful resolutions – reversing the trend in the first two decades after the end of the Cold War.
But neither the US or China, both permanent Security Council members, mentioned reform of the body during their speeches at the UN General Assembly high-level week.
Many other countries did – including India, Japan, Finland and Singapore – shedding light on another aspect of the UN’s crossroads moment. As Washington steps back from its leadership role, other capitals, particularly in the Global South, are growing frustrated over their lack of permanent seats in the UN’s most powerful body.
The exclusive veto power of the five Security Council permanent members, also known as the P5, has frequently left the body paralysed – especially over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and conflicts in the Middle East, where it has achieved little. Russia is one of the P5.
“The Security Council has a composition that doesn’t correspond to the world of today,” UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said last month. “It corresponds to the world of 1945.”
Guterres also expressed support for a proposal from France and Britain – both Security Council permanent members – to limit the right of veto, especially in the case of “massive violation of human rights or dramatic cases of this kind”.
On Wednesday, the UN General Assembly convened a debate on the US vetoing a draft resolution calling for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip on September 18.
“A veto can extinguish hope for those trapped in conflict,” Baerbock said during the meeting.


Fu Cong, China’s permanent representative to the UN, condemned the US move.
“If it were not for the United States’ repeated abuse of the veto, the Security Council’s response to the Gaza crisis would not have been so inadequate,” he said.
“If it were not for the United States’ shielding of Israel, council resolutions and international law would not have been so flagrantly violated.”
Zhu from Bucknell University said reform of the UN was “inevitable and desirable” and the veto power held by the P5 states should be “abolished”.
“Expanding the Security Council is complicated regarding who and how many new members should be included,” he said.
According to Parlamis from the University of San Francisco, Washington’s isolationist policies might create a “tremendous opportunity” for countries in Africa, Asia and South America to step into a leadership role in the UN, which “could also help catalyse long-due reforms”.
“Ultimately, reform of the UN … is most critical to help restore UN legitimacy and efficacy,” she said. “If the US continues to isolate, the world will have no choice but to move on without it.”


Doubts surface over Trump’s South Korea nuclear submarine plan: ‘what’s the catch?’

Japan’s PM wooed Trump with a charm offensive. Did she go too far?

Democrats urge Trump not to ease national security restrictions in negotiations with Xi

US will share tech to let South Korea build a nuclear-powered submarine, Trump says

Diplomacy

US retreat from UN may create ‘tremendous opportunity’ for nations like China

Illustration: Lau Ka-kuen

Annalena Baerbock, president of the General Assembly, said the UN was “still relevant”. Photo: dpa

Donald Trump’s tirade against the UN on September 23 went for nearly an hour. Photo: dpa

Annalena Baerbock delivers closing remarks to the UN General Assembly on Monday. Photo: Xinhua

Beijing reasserts Taiwan position, rebukes West for ‘gross violation’ of global order

On Tuesday, Beijing’s foreign ministry published a position paper stating: “Taiwan is part of China, not a sovereign state; it therefore has no right to send representatives to the UN.” Photo: Getty Images/AFP

Calls grow for first female UN chief in 80 years: ‘let’s make history’

The United Nations logo is seen on a fence outside its headquarters in New York on September 18. Photo: AFP

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres leads a climate summit in New York on Wednesday. Photo: AP

Outgoing United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet gives a final press conference in Geneva in August 2022. Photo: AFP

Premier Li Qiang touts China’s global vision at UN, slams US isolationism

Chinese Premier Li Qiang speaks during the General Debate of the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly on Friday. Photo: EPA

Chinese Premier Li Qiang arrives in New York on Monday to attend the UN General Assembly. Photo: Xinhua

US President Donald Trump on Monday at the UN General Assembly. Photo: Zuma

Did Trump’s Russia rant at UN give China reason for optimism?

President Donald Trump addresses the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly, on Tuesday. China watchers noted that he was restrained in his remarks on Beijing. Photo: AP

US President Donald Trump addresses the United Nations General Assembly in New York on Tuesday. Photo: AP

The US president’s address to the United Nations General Assembly had harsh words for Russia. Photo: Reuters

UN General Assembly: will China rise up to fill US void created by Trump?

The United Nations logo is seen on a fence outside UN headquarters in New York City. Photo: AFP 

Chinese Premier Li Qiang, pictured earlier this month in Beijing, is slated to attend the UN General Assembly. Photo: Xinhua

News

China

Global body is at a crossroads, and observers say a ‘leaderless’ era could emerge during second Trump administration


Global body is at a crossroads, and observers say a ‘leaderless’ era could emerge during second Trump administration.
