Letters | Hong Kong’s removal of property cooling measures will widen wealth gap
- Readers question the rationale behind the removal of stamp duties intended to cool the property market, and point to the benefits of the measure
A flat is first and foremost a home, not an investment vehicle, and as such fulfils the basic human right to shelter.
Investors will rejoice in the reduced upfront costs of acquiring another fixed asset with a more promising outlook for capital appreciation and yield. Meanwhile the wealth gap will only widen, especially as barriers to foreign buyers are all but removed.
How do these policy changes benefit those that need and want a home versus an asset, considering how ridiculously high property prices are currently?
Simon Constantinides, Sai Kung
Removal of property curbs will boost economy
On the one hand, some worry that the result will be skyrocketing property prices, pricing first-time buyers out of the market. On the other hand, the government’s decision will give the property market a boost, which will in turn have a positive impact on other areas of the economy.
Overall, I thought the latest budget was quite bold. I don’t believe the financial secretary has taken a massive risk by removing the property market cooling measures.
Randy Lee, Ma On Shan