Advertisement
Advertisement
Human rights in China
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Trucks line the front of a warehouse of German chemical company BASF in Ludwigshafen. Photo: Reuters

BASF to divest from two China joint ventures over allegations of Xinjiang human rights abuses

  • German chemical giant calls reports of visits to Uygur employees ‘serious allegations that indicate activities inconsistent’ with company’s values
  • China operations ‘otherwise unchanged’, BASF says, pledging full commitment to its ‘business activities and planned investments in the country’
German chemical giant BASF will divest from two joint ventures in China’s Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, following reports that its business partners were involved in human rights abuses.

“Recently published reports related to the joint-venture partner contain serious allegations that indicate activities inconsistent with BASF’s values. Consequently, BASF will accelerate the ongoing process to divest its shares,” read a statement posted on the company’s website on Friday afternoon.

The company said it had conducted its own “regular due diligence measures including internal and external audits” which had not uncovered “any evidence of human rights violations in the two joint ventures”.

Nonetheless, it has taken the decision under intense political scrutiny of its activities in the far-western Chinese region.

The divestment is “subject to negotiations and required approvals of the relevant authorities”, the company said, adding that its China business “remains otherwise unchanged, and the company is fully committed to its business activities and planned investments in the country”.

BASF had been subjected to a pressure campaign urging it to exit Xinjiang, following a joint investigation published last week in the German media outlets ZDF and Der Spiegel finding that its joint venture partner, Xinjiang Markor Chemical Industry, had accompanied Chinese government officials on visits to the homes of Uygur employees.

The visits were part of a state campaign that rights groups have criticised as ways of spying on ethnic Uygurs, who comprised 45 per cent of Xinjiang’s total population in 2021, according to local government statistics.

The Chinese government has been accused of committing “crimes against humanity” in Xinjiang by the United Nations, charges it has repeatedly denied.

China’s Xinjiang invites overseas media to political meetings for first time

The United States and some parliaments in Europe have accused China of committing genocide, a charge Beijing also denies.

After last week’s reports published, a group of 30 lawmakers sent a letter to the company asking it to leave the region immediately.

“The reports indicate the shocking degree to which your company appears to be implicated in gross abuses of the Uygur and other predominantly Turkic minorities in the region,” read the letter, which was subsequently signed by additional members of the European Parliament.

“As advocates for corporate responsibility, human rights, due diligence and respect for basic rights, we urge BASF to withdraw from Xinjiang.

“The credibility and integrity of your company are at stake, and we believe it is crucial for you to take swift and decisive action in addressing this matter,” it added.

China to more tightly control ethnic minority discussion to temper ‘risks’

“It is our hope that BASF will take this matter seriously and prioritise the well-being of those in Xinjiang who are suffering grievously under oppressive and discriminatory policies.”

The German company has been a prominent investor in China and Xinjiang in particular, where its presence has come in for close media and political scrutiny in recent years.

The recent reports were based on research by Adrian Zenz, a German anthropologist whose work has been widely cited by Western governments and media. Allegations of systemic detentions, incarcerations and forced labour among the minority Uygur and other ethnic Muslims in Xinjiang have mounted in recent years.

In 2022, the Uygur Forced Labour Prevention Act took effect, an American law Washington said would cut out goods made in the region under duress.
The European Union is now processing a forced-labour ban that would be geographically agnostic in its application, but which was written with Xinjiang in mind.
92