Quad bloc commits to Indo-Pacific disaster response plan on UN sidelines
- Group China calls ‘Asia’s Nato’ comprising US, India, Japan and Australia reiterates ‘multilateral cooperation’ in support of ‘free and open’ region
- Alliance’s widening reach in Indo-Pacific could elicit more ‘hostility’ from Beijing and require it to deliver on ensuring stability, analysts say
The White House now describes the strategic bloc as a “a premier regional grouping … on issues that matter to the Indo-Pacific”.
Japanese Foreign Minister Yoshimasa Hayashi said it was “extremely significant” that Quad nations “demonstrate” their firm commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific region as the world “witnesses direct attempts to unilaterally change the status quo by force”.
Hayashi said this vision could not be achieved without cooperating with the countries in the region and contributing to solving their problems.
According to James Schwemlein of the South Asia programme at the Washington-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the initiative recalls the Quad’s origins.
When it was established in 2004, the Quad nations worked together to respond to the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami that killed more than 220,000 people. But the alliance fell apart after Australia under former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd decided to pursue better ties with China.
Sheila Smith of the Council on Foreign Relations said no “rebranding” was necessary for the Quad, as it had always defined itself as “focused on the needs of the region”. Smith pointed to “no evidence” of the group’s meetings being “some sort of military alliance”, as claimed by Beijing.
“The Quad is not an alliance,” she said, adding that it was “one of the many minilateral groupings that populate the region”.
Yun Sun, director of the China programme at the Stimson Centre, a Washington think tank, believed the Quad’s widening scope and reach in the region would elicit more “hostility” from China because it “covers more dimensions other than security, and it does have the appeal because it [has] focused on non-security issues”.
The Quad’s “non-military focus, as manifested, also demonstrates varying levels of willingness among the four members to forge [a] collective military approach toward China”, she added.
What comes next for the Quad, however, is an open question.
US must alter course in how it deals with China or face conflict: Wang Yi
As long as the leaders of the Quad nations see a benefit in working with one another, Smith said, the bloc would continue and the results would determine the region’s receptivity to it.
“Already, they have produced results in providing Covid vaccines and in helping to establish vaccine production in the region. A new maritime domain awareness effort will help nations monitor illegal activity across this vast maritime region,” she added. “Results are emerging from this common effort.”
But Tanvi Madan, director of The India Project at the Brookings Institution, wrote in an opinion piece that the Quad “must do more to deliver on its core security goals” and “manage expectations on what it can achieve”. Madan said China’s “growing assertiveness demands that the group move with greater urgency”.
“The idea is to provide choice, stability, and to bring resources to the region that otherwise might not have been available.”