We stick labels on China – or the US – at our own peril
Tom Plate says generalisations only mislead when we’re trying to understand complex giants like China and America


The Council on Foreign Relations is a pillar institution of the American establishment, its members offering views so carefully mediated as to comprise virtually a power-elite consensus on international issues, intended as all but official briefing papers for the White House, the Pentagon and the State Department.
How China can turn the tables on Donald Trump’s America
But it is a him, not a her, moving into the White House; and the prospect of Donald Trump bothering to ponder the report issued by the council – or any of the other similar work products from Washington or New York think tanks that were lining up like toy soldiers to salute a Clinton administration – are next to zero. All those reports timed for Hillary Clinton’s coronation might now as well be heaved into the Potomac.

Trump’s America: The good, the bad and the ugly
Consider this: until the first Tuesday of this month, the entrenched New York/Washington elite was not just the life of the party; it hired the bouncers. Now they become the bouncees – the new policy outliers, red-faced with loss: another America is on top – the one not of our two flashy coasts so much as of our core interior heartland.