-
Advertisement
South China Sea
Opinion

In the South China Sea, no sign of a thaw between China and the US

Mark Valencia says all signs point to a nervous status quo in the South China Sea – though an out-and-out war is unlikely, the prospects of a truce, even a temporary one, are bleak

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Mark Valencia says all signs point to a nervous status quo in the South China Sea – though an out-and-out war is unlikely, the prospects of a truce, even a temporary one, are bleak
Mark J. Valencia
If the Trump administration follows hawkish advice and pursues confrontational policies towards China, this could result in a true cold war, with all the negative ramifications for the region’s peace, stability, economics and politics. More worrying, this could break out in a “hot war” at any time. Illustration: Craig Stephens
If the Trump administration follows hawkish advice and pursues confrontational policies towards China, this could result in a true cold war, with all the negative ramifications for the region’s peace, stability, economics and politics. More worrying, this could break out in a “hot war” at any time. Illustration: Craig Stephens
There is an air of anxiety and uncertainty regarding the future of the contest between China and the US in the South China Sea. This is understandable given the wobbly leadership transition in the US, the uncertainty surrounding the Trump administration’s policy towards China, and the equally uncertain Chinese reaction to it. Meanwhile, those favouring a US confrontation with China are clamouring for more aggressive US action, while others are urging caution.

In an optimistic best-case scenario, China and the US will make a pseudo – and temporary – grand bargain which the region’s countries will have to live with. That the US would even consider – let alone make – such a deal would indicate to all that it recognises and respects China’s status as a dominant regional power. This is really what China wants – for now.

Under Trump, Sino-US ties are a work in progress

Strategically, this would set the tone for the region – in essence a political and military stand-down. China would refrain from further occupation, construction and “militarisation” on its claimed features. It would also not undertake any provocative action like occupying and building on Scarborough Shoal, harassing other claimants in the area and declaring an air defence identification zone over the Spratlys. The US, in turn, would decrease or cease altogether its provocative freedom of navigation operations and its “close-in” intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance probes, which China says threaten its security. It would also refrain from belligerent actions like “blockading” China’s occupied features.

Advertisement
US Navy personnel carry a missile on the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson during a routine exercise last week in the South China Sea. The likelihood of more “accidents” involving the Chinese and US warships and planes in the South China Sea cannot be ruled out. Photo: Reuters
US Navy personnel carry a missile on the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson during a routine exercise last week in the South China Sea. The likelihood of more “accidents” involving the Chinese and US warships and planes in the South China Sea cannot be ruled out. Photo: Reuters

This scenario – a tense “agreement to disagree” – is not without its downside. Since nothing would be fully and finally resolved, it would probably result in intensifying competition – a “cool war” – between the two for soft-power influence in the region. This would intensify pressure on the region’s countries to pick and choose between them. It could even see stepped-up covert operations by both in the vulnerable countries, in which the two powers would support “friendly” domestic factions and foment opposition to its “enemy”. So this situation may simply be kicking the can down the road.

That the US would even consider such a deal would indicate to all that it respects China’s status as a dominant regional power. This is really what China wants – for now

Whatever its merits and demerits, this scenario is unlikely because of the pressure from military hawks and nationalists on both sides for their respective leaders to be more aggressive. More likely is a worse scenario in which the Trump administration follows hawkish advice and pursues across-the-board confrontational policies towards China in general, and in the South China Sea in particular.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x