-
Advertisement
ESF - English Schools Foundation
Opinion

ESF school fee rises hurt Hong Kong’s middle class, and the city as a whole

Mike Rowse says the parents whose children rely on the English Schools Foundation for an education deserve government support, as they are an integral part of the workforce that keeps the economy growing

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
An English Schools Foundation (ESF) Computing Conference at South Island School in Aberdeen. Photo: David Wong
Mike Rowse
The impoverishment of Hong Kong’s middle class came a step closer this month with the assistance of our ever helpful Education Bureau. The English Schools Foundation announced that fee increases of up to 27.5 per cent had been approved by the government to take effect from the coming academic year. Year Two fees in the foundation’s nine primary schools will now cost HK$106,500. Fees for Year One – which had a similar steep percentage rise last year – will be the same. In the years to come, increases on this scale will work their way through the whole school system until ESF fees at all levels will approach those charged by international schools.

In the past, such an announcement would have evoked howls of protest from parents whose children attend ESF schools, all heaping blame on the foundation. But now it is widely understood that the cause of these enormous increases is the progressive withdrawal of the annual government subvention.

Announcement of the subvention cancellation – phased over a number of years so as to “soften the blow” – is the enduring legacy of our previous education minister, Eddie Ng Hak-kim.

ESF board votes to end HK$283m schools subsidy

It is easy to forget that at the time of the 2012 chief executive election, all three candidates pledged to retain the subvention if they were elected. They may well have been sincere, but they were no match for the fanaticism of the education bureaucrats.

Is there no way back, or are we destined forever to drive away the very people essential for the future success of our economy?

When the ESF was first established, it was basically to provide schooling for the children of expatriate civil servants. The government met the whole cost. This was manifestly unfair to locals, including civil servants, as ESF classes were smaller and the facilities were better, hence the subsidy per child was much higher than for local children. After many years of complaint, the subvention formula was changed so that the subsidy per child in an ESF school was pitched at the same level as the cost of educating a local child in a local school. The difference in costs was met by the introduction of fees. That made things fair, and there matters should have been allowed to rest.

Advertisement

But that is to reckon without the professional fury of some education bureaucrats who saw the popularity of all international schools, especially among local parents, as a standing indictment of the standard of education in local schools, for which they were directly responsible. Which of course it was. They reserved a dedicated corner of their hearts for a special hatred of the ESF, because it was similar in many respects to a full international school and even got government money to boot. They bided their time, and under a weak minister eventually got their way.

Much work needed to bridge education gap

Tourists take selfies at the Peak in Hong Kong, Hong Kong needs to attract and retain foreign and local professionals if we are to keep our economy growing. Photo: Reuters
Tourists take selfies at the Peak in Hong Kong, Hong Kong needs to attract and retain foreign and local professionals if we are to keep our economy growing. Photo: Reuters
Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x