Hong Kong’s Chinese and Western influences must coexist if ‘one country, two systems’ is to work
- Regina Ip says Hong Kong’s old balance of Chinese cultural traditions and Western values, like the rule of law, is coming apart due to anti-China zealots
On the eve of Hong Kong’s reunification with China in 1997, the slogan “Tomorrow will be better” was writ large on placards hoisted on prominent buildings across the city. Many were hopeful that, free of the shackles of colonialism, Hong Kong would reach new heights as a highly treasured special administrative region of China.
Watch: Hong Kong raises flags to mark 21st anniversary of handover
For most of the time in the colonial era, the British governed the local community with Confucian values, encouraging thrift, hard work, self-help and the family as the cornerstone of society. Religious groups and charitable organisations spearheaded education. Rule of law was treasured more for the protection of property rights and the certainty it provided to business than for the protection of individual rights and freedoms.
An ideological revolution quietly got under way in the run-up to 1997, when the departing British administration rushed through democratic reform to provide a check on executive power and, by extension, Beijing’s ability to exert control. In the last decade before the handover, the British administration raced against the clock to legislate on the bill of rights, protection of personal data privacy and equal opportunity, and against discrimination according to race, sex, family status and disability.
It also rolled back legislation which gave the police robust powers to protect state security.
Hong Kong can be justly proud of the high reputation of its most senior judges – the distinguished overseas jurists who firmly anchor Hong Kong in the common law system. However, post 1997, the Court of Final Appeal has taken on the extrajudicial role of safeguarding not only the independence of the judiciary, but also the core values of Western civilisation – freedom and human rights. As Robert Tang Ching, recently retired judge of the Court of Final Appeal, stressed in his valedictory speech, “Common law can be used oppressively. It is protean power, unless adequately controlled by the proper application of human rights law, that can be misused”.
Judicial independence, democratic elections, strong protection of freedom and human rights are indeed distinguishing characteristics of our society, which set us apart from the rest of China and connect us with the Western world; supposedly the institutional advantages which render Hong Kong uniquely valuable to China. Yet they might become too much of a good thing if such Western values are promoted as universal “core values” to counter and displace China’s cultural and ideological influence.
Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee is a lawmaker and chairwoman of the New People’s Party