Advertisement
US-China relations
Opinion
Regina Ip

Opinion | From trade war to a clash of civilisations: how China and the West can avoid major confrontation

  • Regina Ip says China is a civilisational power for whom democracy is no easy fit, making its rivalry with the West hard to resolve. Beijing must do better at presenting its point of view, while the West needs to understand China’s eventful history

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
A cordial relationship between Chinese President Xi Jinping and his US counterpart Donald Trump has not prevented a sharp deterioration in relations between the two countries over the past year. Photo: AFP
More than 170 years after China’s humiliating defeat in the first opium war, 70 years after the establishment of New China, 40 years after China’s reform and opening up and 18 years after China’s accession to the World Trade Organisation – just as the nation seemed firmly set on an irreversible trajectory to become a world power – the trade war and technology boycott led by the US threaten to deal a body blow to Beijing’s global ambitions.
Despite its record trade surplus with the US in 2018, significant declines in China’s total exports (by 4.4 per cent) and imports (by 7.6 per cent) in December show the devastating effects of US President Donald Trump’s tariffs. Even more devastating than the tariff war is the tech war waged by the Trump administration. The ban on the export of specialty chips to China and the banishment of China’s tech giant Huawei from the 5G markets of the US and its “Five Eyes” allies send clear signals that a US-led coalition is bent on keeping China’s tech development at bay.
One cannot pin the blame solely on China’s “state capitalism” or its “egregious” national industrial policy. There is nothing fundamentally different from what East Asian economies like Japan and South Korea pursued to jump-start their economies after the second world war.
Advertisement

As is well documented by scholars on Japan’s post-war economic miracle, Japan adopted a deliberate strategy of domestic market protection by erecting tariff and non-tariff barriers, grooming “national champions” in selected industries, targeting US rivals and making copycat production by reverse engineering.

The economic development of both Japan and South Korea in their nascent years was marked by a symbiotic relationship between their governments and big corporations. The governments of other smaller Asian “tigers” – Taiwan and Singapore – abstained from building tariff barriers but followed suit by picking winners with strong backing from the state.

In China’s case, size clearly matters. According to Professor Lawrence J. Lau, from 1978 to 2017, China’s share of world trade rose from 0.5 per cent to 10.2 per cent; while its share of the world’s GDP rose from 1.75 per cent to 15.2 per cent. As a continental economy with the world’s largest population, the unleashing of its teaming manpower and, more recently, brainpower, lifted the largest numbers of people out of poverty in human history.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x