Letters to the Editor, May 29, 2013
I find it hard to understand how Peter Lok, in his letter ("Nomination process not negotiable", May 20) could reach the conclusion that my article ("The key step", May 8) was, in his words: "meant to persuade the government to get rid of the nomination of candidates in the election of the chief executive".

I find it hard to understand how Peter Lok, in his letter ("Nomination process not negotiable", May 20) could reach the conclusion that my article ("The key step", May 8) was, in his words: "meant to persuade the government to get rid of the nomination of candidates in the election of the chief executive".
On the contrary, the purpose of my article was to highlight the need for major changes to the composition and electoral arrangements for the 2016 Legco in order to pave the way for the establishment of the nominating committee in 2017 and election of all Legco members by universal suffrage in 2020.
I and my colleagues in Hong Kong 2020 have stated publicly our firm intention to formulate proposals that conform strictly with the terms of the Basic Law, including Article 45 which provides for, and I quote, "selection of the chief executive by universal suffrage upon nomination by a broadly representative nominating committee in accordance with democratic procedures".
Seeking to establish a process of screening of candidates, to ensure their acceptability to the central government, would be totally at odds with both the letter and the spirit of Article 45.
Anson Chan, Happy Valley